home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / rec / music / synth / 18768 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-22  |  904 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!emoryu1!labmsp
  2. From: labmsp@emory.edu (Matthew Pease)
  3. Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
  4. Subject: Peavey DPM 3 vs. K2000
  5. Message-ID: <labmsp.722454741@unix.cc.emory.edu>
  6. Date: 22 Nov 92 17:52:21 GMT
  7. Organization: Emory University Computing Center
  8. Lines: 14
  9.  
  10. Ok everyone sampling time aside, How does the DPM 3's sound generation
  11. capabilities compare to the K2000's?  Supposedly these two synths are
  12. similar in that the sound generation algorithms are similarly software
  13. based.  Peavey released their synth a while ago but they haven't seemed
  14. to create any new methods of sound creation.  What I would like is 
  15. a keyboard that is capable of sampling and is also capable of very
  16. diverse sound creation.  Would the K2000 or the DPM allow me to do that?
  17.  
  18. Any ideas?
  19.  
  20. Thanks in advance,
  21. Matthew Pease
  22. labmsp@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu
  23.  
  24.