home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!ncar!uchinews!ellis!enf1
- From: enf1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Eric Fischer)
- Subject: Re: Vocal Elimination the easy way (was Re: Beatle Anomalies)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.010443.4062@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: enf1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <1doecfINNfui@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk> <1992Nov10.214347.19254@midway.uchicago.edu> <62093@mimsy.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:04:43 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In my defense, I'm not an audio engineer, or even a very good electronics
- experimenter. I was just describing what techniques work for me. But, I
- suppose I should clarify on the points which Dan Kozak recently wrote.
-
- When I wrote "inaudible to most people," at first I thought people might
- misunderstand what I was saying and decide that I meant that phase change
- rendered the sound itself inaudible, not that the change could not be heard,
- but I decided that this reading was improbable enough that it didn't need
- to be changed. But even so, inaudible apparently isn't the same for all
- people.
-
- My phasing experience is clearly quite different than yours. Try
- as I have, I can't seem to distinguish phasing, and while I can't cite other
- sources I was under the impression that others could not do so either. Hence,
- your exercise in head-moving is quite lost on me.
-
- I do want to challenge your assertion that LPs have especially poor channel
- separation, though; admittedly it is not great, but cassettes, having four
- channels recorded on such a small space, often suffer from channel bleeding.
- This is the experience I have had, at least.
-
- Eric
-
-