home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!tc.fluke.COM
- From: moore@tc.fluke.COM (Matt Moore)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: Bad tactical position ( was Psychology in Defense)
- Message-ID: <9211232145.AA00763@whirlwind>
- Date: 24 Nov 92 00:02:59 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
- Lines: 33
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
- In article <75209@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt4458c@prism.gatech.edu (John Stephens Cronin) writes:
- #
- #What if the perp is armed with a knife and starts walking very deliberately
- #towards you from 20 feet away.
- # ....
- #So, if
- #you were in this situation, why not shoot for the legs (assuming you have a
- #big enough gun and are a good enough shot)?
- #
-
- Several reasons why not:
-
- 1) Just because he is moving slowly now doesn't mean he will keep on
- moving slowly. If a normally agile person rushes you from 20 ft away, he
- can stab you in under 1.5 seconds (or so says Massad Ayoob). Conversely,
- even shooting him in the heart is not guaranteed to put him down for 15
- seconds. So you do not have any time to spare on less effective shots.
-
- 2) Most people aren't good enough marksmen to get reliable incapacitation
- from leg shots. You would have to hit the bones, which are less than one
- inch wide along most of the leg. How many practice on moving targets at
- all? I don't have any easy way to do so.
-
- 3) Shooting at legs can also play against you in court. It could be
- argued that you did not believe lethal force to be necessary or justified
- at the time you used it, and that this is proven by your decision to
- shoot only at non-lethal areas. But shooting a gun at someone is always
- "lethal force" in the eyes of the law.
-
- Matt Moore
- John Fluke Mfg. Co.
- standard disclaimers apply
-
-