NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/rec/games/go/2342

Internet Message Format | 1992-11-22 | 3.6 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu!focus!jlzhong
From: [e-mail] (Jialin Zhong)
Newsgroups: rec.games.go
Subject: Re: Change my strength?
Date: 22 Nov 1992 11:17:30 GMT
Organization: Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: focus.csl.uiuc.edu

Hi Tero,

[e-mail] (Tero Sand) writes:

>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jialin Zhong) writes:
>>While believe or not, I will never set my rank to 3.5UFO (only an example)
>>although UFO is some kind of standard on igs. The whole thing is not which
>>ranking system is better. Igs is only an informal forum for go lovers to have
>>a place to play. Any ranking system, even the UFO system, is not and will not
>>be perfect. So what is the point? As I and Youyi pointed out before, play with
>[cut]

>You know, this thing cuts both ways. You say you don't understand why
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>some people want a ranking system, but what _I_ don't understand is why
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>some people (not you, necessarily, you might not just give a damn

I said, if you read my posting again and carefully, that I did not understand
why some people were so worried about other people's ranking. I hope you
quote me right if you want to quote. Be frank with you, what I mean is that
I don't understand why, for example, a 7kyu worries about whether a 7 dan is
a real 7 dan or not. Do you think the worry is necessary? What I don't give
a damn is not which particular ranking system (I happen to have the view that
there is no perfect way to rank players on igs, too bad). I don't give a damn
to whether or not someone who I don't even know is a true 7kyu (only as an
example) or not. I am more concerned about the game than how other people
should be properly ranked.

>(frankly)) seem to vehemently *oppose* the idea. My view: as long as you
>can still set the rank manually, and the server doesn't force handicaps
>according to rank, those that don't care about ranks can continue to do
>so.

Okey, so what is the point? There still will be a mass on igs.


>And one more thing. Setting an arbitrary rating system seems silly to
>me. Whatever system you use, anybody who has had enough brains to learn
>go can easily calculate the equivalent kyu/dan rating.


Yes, it is kind of arbitrary, or more properly put it, self-estimating.
However, I believe most player's rankings are set for some reasons. Once
they found they were overrated, they would lower their ranking to a
relatively proper one. I noticed several cases in which 6 dans lower to 5 dans.
Of course, there are some notorious cases (like my 8d joke :)). I would
just ignore them whenever they ask me for a game.


>    Tero Sand, 2 kyu
>--
>    EMail: [e-mail]   or   [e-mail]
>   "I feel most ministers who claim they've heard God's voice are eating
>too much pizza before they go to bed at night, and it's really an
>intestinal disorder, not a revelation." - Reverend Jerry Falwell



Jialin
--
Jialin Zhong            *   /  l    l        l   l  *    ---O--O--O--O---
1614 Beckman Institute        *  / l-l-l -l-l l-l -l- -l- *   /--*--*--*--O--O
Urbana, IL 61801        * /l l-l-l /  l l-l /l\ /l\ *  /--/--*--/--*--O
[e-mail] */ l   l  /  \l    / l X l \* /--/--/--/--/--/