home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.gambling
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!batcomputer!cornell!rochester!rit!isc-newsserver!jsvrc
- From: jsvrc@rc.rit.edu (J A Stephen Viggiano)
- Subject: Re: GAMBLER'S MATE Week 11
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.154156.9170@ultb.isc.rit.edu>
- Sender: news@ultb.isc.rit.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rcmain.rc.rit.edu
- Organization: RIT Research Corp
- References: <4520.120.uupcb@cccbbs.UUCP> <1992Nov18.194001.26800@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <1eehhdINNabq@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:41:56 GMT
- Lines: 9
-
- In article <1eehhdINNabq@agate.berkeley.edu> jacob@ocf.berkeley.edu (Jacob Jin) writes:
-
- >If you review some earlier posts, many express similar opinions about
- >the Centigram Quad X5 Matrix, and you don't see them posting much
- >anymore, do you? A lot of people use G-mate, actually, and with the
- >correct 60% success rate it boasts. The same could be said of The CQX5M.
-
- Okay, I'm convinced. Gambler's Mate is as big a joke as the Centigram Quad
- X5 Matrix.
-