home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.aviation.owning
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!porthos!dasher!patter
- From: patter@dasher.cc.bellcore.com (patterson,george r)
- Subject: Re: Cherokee 140 vs. C-172
- Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 19:13:04 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.191304.16219@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
- References: <1992Nov23.155711.16741@nuchat.sccsi.com>
- Sender: netnews@porthos.cc.bellcore.com (USENET System Software)
- Lines: 39
-
- In article <1992Nov23.155711.16741@nuchat.sccsi.com> conover@nuchat.sccsi.com (Mark Allen Conover) writes:
- >May I have some opinions on the following thought process?
-
- How 'bout some facts instead.
-
- >If I am willing to settle for a three-person aircraft, why not purchase
- >a less expensive PA28-140?
-
- Comparing the C172 with the PA-28 150hp versions;
-
- Cessna Piper
- ------ -----
- Max 139mph same
- Cruise 131 130
- Stall 49 53
- Fuel 42 gal 36 gal
- Ceiling 13,100' 14,300'
- ROC 645fpm 660
- TO over 50' 1,525' 1,750'
- Ground run 865' 800'
- Land over 50' 1,250' 1,890'
- Ground roll 520' 535'
- Gross 2,300 lb 2,150
- Empty 1,265 lb. 1,205
- TBO 2,000 hours 1,200 w/o mods 2,000 with
-
- Both have versions of the Lycoming O-320. As you can see, the 172 can carry
- more and get in and out of shorter fields. According to the NTSB, the 172
- has the best safety record in its class and the Piper has one of the worst.
-
- All data taken from "The Illustrated Buyer's Guide to Used Airplanes". This
- book obtained these figures from the manufacturers.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- |
- George Patterson - | When you're working on a project and drop
- | something, it will never reach the ground.
- |
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-