home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!cc
- From: cc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Chris Cooke)
- Newsgroups: rec.autos
- Subject: Re: shoud there be two different licences
- Message-ID: <CC.92Nov17130901@arran.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 13:09:01 GMT
- References: <1992Nov12.013141.7090@wam.umd.edu> <1992Nov17.020743.8935@news.Hawaii.Edu>
- Sender: cnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
- Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
- Lines: 15
- In-Reply-To: ross@tarski.tmc.edu's message of 17 Nov 92 02:07:43 GMT
-
- In article <1992Nov17.020743.8935@news.Hawaii.Edu> ross@tarski.tmc.edu (David Ross) writes:
-
- In article <1992Nov12.013141.7090@wam.umd.edu> jailbird@next02wor.wam.umd.edu (serial killer) writes:
- >Should we have a one licence to operate a manual transmisssion and one
- >for automatic
-
- This is common outside the US (e.g., the U.K.); it is no protection
- against cretinous drivers.
-
- But it does ensure that people at least know how to change gear, which is
- what it's meant to do.
- --
- -- Chris. cc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (on Janet, cc@uk.ac.ed.dcs)
-
-
-