home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!oracle!unrepliable!bounce
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
- From: jeras@oracle.com (John Eras)
- Subject: Re: So you want to write a text adventure?
- In-Reply-To: dmb@xbar.ai.mit.edu's message of 17 Nov 92 07:15:38 GMT
- Message-ID: <JERAS.92Nov17185450@hqsun2.oracle.com>
- Sender: usenet@oracle.us.oracle.com (Oracle News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hqsun2.us.oracle.com
- Organization: Oracle Corp., Belmont CA
- References: <1992Nov15.234938.12993@starbase.trincoll.edu>
- <1992Nov16.021205.16797@starbase.trincoll.edu> <41084@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>
- <1ea66qINNkr6@life.ai.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 02:54:50 GMT
- X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
- at Oracle Corporation. The opinions expressed are those
- of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.
- Lines: 47
-
- In article <1ea66qINNkr6@life.ai.mit.edu> dmb@xbar.ai.mit.edu (David Baggett) writes:
- In article <41084@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> djohnson@cs.ucsd.edu (Darin Johnson) writes:
- >Yep. Better than spending years on a similar system in order to get
- >something people could use. Right now, TADS and any adventures
- >people have written in TADS (even adventures people want to give
- >away for free) are *useless* to me and many other people.
-
- This will become a moot point in the near future. The system *will*
- get ported to Unix and to the Amiga once 2.0 is released. My
- impression is that Mike didn't want people to port 1.X since 2.0 was
- just around the corner. So don't give up hope. There are certain
- factions that *very much* want to see their games run under Unix,
- AmigaOS, and any other OS that can display text. (We won't mention any
- names, but they would even consider a port to Acme BogOs.)
-
- I'm sure both Mike and this mysterious unnamed person (and lots of other
- people besides) all want the same thing in an ideal world -- i.e., having
- TADS run on every platform with tons of satisfied users and smiles all
- around...
-
- But I think it's a little more complicated than this. There are some
- things High Energy would have to consider before allowing other people
- to do TADS ports, such as:
-
- - How do you compensate the porter(s)? Should they get anything besides
- the pleasure of using TADS on their favorite BitMaster 2000 (tm)
- machine.
- - Who sells the new product? High Energy or the porter?
- - Who supports the new product? High Energy can't. What if the porter
- is not prepared to do this either? What incentive would the porter
- have for supporting the product?
- - How do you deal with bug fixes and upgrades? This could be a real
- coordination hassle.
- - Etc., etc.
-
- One of the advantages of High Energy doing all the ports in-house is
- that they can maintain the high quality of the product, support their
- users, and release their products on each of the supported platforms at
- the same time.
-
- You sounded pretty sure that there would be other TADS ports in the
- future (I presume you've talked to Mike about this). I just don't know
- if you should necessarily rely on this, but feel free to correct me if
- you know better.
-
- --
- jeras@us.oracle.com
-