home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!b63519.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu!dpn2
- From: dpn2@po.CWRU.Edu (Damien P. Neil)
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
- Subject: Re: Parser heresy (was Re: Searching for a sense of wonder)
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:55:15 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University
- Lines: 38
- Message-ID: <dpn2.103.722044514@po.CWRU.Edu>
- References: <1e5mvtINNnlp@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> <1992Nov15.155951.3262@starbase.trincoll.edu> <BxttrL.E6x@acsu.buffalo.edu> <1ea71uINNkv1@life.ai.mit.edu> <blasius.88.722034873@gmd.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: b63519.student.cwru.edu
-
- In article <blasius.88.722034873@gmd.de> blasius@gmd.de (Volker Blasius) writes:
- >In article <1ea71uINNkv1@life.ai.mit.edu> dmb@xbar.ai.mit.edu (David Baggett)
- >writes:
- >>*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
- >>>get the book from the troll
- >>The troll sees your lame attempt from a mile away. He laughs in your face.
- >
- >>>get the book from the troll very quickly
- >>You snatch the book away with a lightning-fast jerk.
- >
- >>*** Your score just went up ***
- >>*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
- >
- >>I have one thing to say: "NOT!"
- >
- >To be honest, I can and I saw it in WORLD: some things you had to do slowly
- >or cautiously or some such, and it seemed quite natural to me - life isn't
- >just a binary do-don't. Where is the problem? Does it complicate the game
- >too much? To use your example, should 'snatch the book from the troll' work,
- >just because it is orthodox syntax? I just don't understand your argument.
-
- If you give a command to the actor, you expect it to carry it out to the
- best of its ability. When you tell it so take a book away from the troll,
- you assume that the action will be carried out in the most appropriate
- fashion, i.e. very quickly. If you get a message telling you that you were
- not able to steal the book, a logical conclusion would be that the troll is
- faster than the actor.
-
- Problems that require an adverb to work are syntactical juggling rather than
- logical puzzles. Now, if a clue was given at some point that an adverb was
- required, that would be a different matter. However, such usage should still
- be discouraged since it has not been customary in the past.
-
- A puzzle should have a logical solution. The old game of "guess what the
- author _really_ wanted you to type" grows old very quickly...
- +-------------+------------------+---------------------------------+
- | Damien Neil | dpn2@po.cwru.edu | Case Western Reserve University |
- +-------------+------------------+---------------------------------+
-