home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / rec / arts / drwho / 8027 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-20  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!master.cs.rose-hulman.edu!master.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news
  2. From: rickert@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John H. Rickert)
  3. Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
  4. Subject: Re: Who'd make THE BEST Who???
  5. Date: 20 Nov 1992 18:31:52 GMT
  6. Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
  7. Lines: 18
  8. Message-ID: <1ejauoINNhcu@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
  9. References: <hnz1n2#@rpi.edu>
  10. Reply-To: rickert@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John H. Rickert)
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: g215a-1.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
  12.  
  13. In article <hnz1n2#@rpi.edu> danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.)  
  14. writes:
  15. > Hmm.. Michael Caine. I actually considered that for a while. Here's another 
  16. > idea that will get a lot of people mad at me...
  17. > 
  18. > John Lithgow.
  19. > 
  20. > Granted, we've never seen him playing anything really close to that type of
  21. > role, but I caught an interview with him on some cable channel recently and
  22. > it just hit me... "he'd make a great Doctor!".
  23. Gee, I've thought that for several years. 
  24. He's a good actor and doesn't have an established 'identity'.
  25. Seems to me that that's just what we need in the actor 
  26. portraying the Doctor.
  27.  
  28. seeing, hearing (my two sense worth)
  29. john rickert
  30. rickert@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
  31.