home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!daffy!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!brown
- From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
- Subject: Re: PLanet of the Daleks
- Message-ID: <4447@vidiot.UUCP>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 05:15:42 GMT
- Article-I.D.: vidiot.4447
- References: <17023@umd5.umd.edu> <1992Nov17.024419.7132@cs.ucf.edu>
- Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
- Organization: Vidiot's Hangout
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Nov17.024419.7132@cs.ucf.edu> wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson) writes:
- <otten@quark.umd.edu (Neil Ottenstein) wrote:
- <>This weekend I just saw Planet of he Daleks and I was wondering what the
- <>details are about the "missing" episode in this story.
- <
- <#3 is not missing. It is B&W and is not shown as part of the movie version.
- <Some places that show episode format MAY show it (I don't know that). Part
- <of #4 is edited out to because it follows from #3. Basically, the episode
- <revolves around the Doctor's escape from the Daleks. If you'll remember that
- <he is captured and then somehow miraculously is out when he runs into Jo.
-
- I have taken the movie version and edited back in the pieces that were edited
- from episode 2 and 4. Of course, I edited back in episode 3, even though it
- was in B&W. The editing was done on 3/4" Umatic equipment.
-
- The thing to note about the movie is that not only were pieces edited out
- in episodes 2 and 4, but pieces were actually rearranged. After seeing the
- completed version, one wonders why the B&W section was edited out. We know
- why it was done, but it shouldn't have been.
- --
- harvard\ spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
- Vidiot ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
- rutgers/ INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
- brown@wi.extrel.com
-