home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!news
- From: hill@norman.VI.RI.CMU.EDU (Robert Hill)
- Newsgroups: news.groups
- Subject: Re: RFD: rec.games.netrek reorganization
- Message-ID: <By62CA.6vG.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 11:24:10 GMT
- Article-I.D.: cs.By62CA.6vG.2
- References: <1eq75aINN3j4@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
- Reply-To: hill@norman.vi.ri.cmu.edu
- Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
- Lines: 28
- Nntp-Posting-Host: alexander.vi.ri.cmu.edu
-
- Tom Holub writes
- > )Yep..I guess they are. I don't have to agree with them. The question
- > )is
- > ): does following proper procedure help or hurt most readers of
- > )rec.games.netrek? I'll let you figure it out...
- >
- > I think it helps. I think there is a large subset of the r.g.n
- > population
- > that has no interest in this discussion, and that moving it to
- > news.groups lets those people read about netrek, which is what they
- > wanted to do when they subscribed. I think most groups have a large
- > subset of people who have no interest in discussions about group
- > splits, which is why discussions about group splits belong in
- > news.groups.
-
- Do you think more readers of r.g.n. would want to know about it or not? I
- think that a much lager subset of r.g.n. readers would like to know.
- Besides, its not like we are talking alot of posts here. Its just
- pointless to sift through 100 news.groups messages everyday.
-
- > There is a large and boring flame war going on on this topic right
- > now, get in on that if you think the guidelines are wrong.
- > -Tom
-
- I do...but i'm unsubscribing to news.groups today. I have no desire to
- sit and read this stuff.
-
- Rob
-