home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / news / groups / 22063 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-17  |  1.2 KB  |  28 lines
  1. Newsgroups: news.groups
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!mdisea!uw-coco!uw-beaver!graham
  3. From: graham@cs.washington.edu (Stephen Graham)
  4. Subject: Re: rec.games.frp.campaign: A New Opinion
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov16.213755.16712@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
  6. Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System)
  7. Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
  8. References: <Bxq0K3.Fpt@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <BxqyzB.EJ7@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>
  9. Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 21:37:55 GMT
  10. Lines: 16
  11.  
  12. In article <BxqyzB.EJ7@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> cbnorman@cayley.uwaterloo.ca () writes:
  13. >.Campaign is only for non-defunct campaign posts, as in campaigns which
  14. >are continuing.  Any fiction based on past campaigns would be put in 
  15. >.archives (where I am currently posting the "Forbidden" and "Accursed"
  16. >chronicals, two of my own net campaigns).
  17. >  
  18. Pardon me, but if they're all written up as fiction, how are you going to
  19. tell the difference? The notion of splitting "campaign summaries" between
  20. two groups based on the criterion of when the action is occurring seems
  21. silly. Of course, there's no way to enforce this in an unmoderated group.
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25. -- 
  26. Stephen Graham
  27. graham@cs.washington.edu     uw-beaver!june!graham
  28.