home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky news.admin.policy:406 news.admin:8550 news.sysadmin:1457
- Newsgroups: news.admin.policy,news.admin,news.sysadmin
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!nuug!nntp.nta.no!hal.nta.no!styri
- From: styri@hal.nta.no (Haakon Styri)
- Subject: Re: a.b.p.e distribution, pay membership (Was: RE: Child Pornography)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.163545.5382@nntp.nta.no>
- Sender: styri@hal.nta.no (YuNoHoo)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: balder.nta.no
- Reply-To: styri@nta.no
- Organization: Norwegian Telecom Research
- References: <1992Nov10.074320.5826@ais.com> <EMCGUIRE.92Nov11161022@fuller.intellection.com> <Bxo8MF.21r@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 16:35:45 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- Henry Spencer (henry@zoo.toronto.edu) writes:
- > [stuff deleted]
- > It would make sense for Usenet and similar entities to be common carriers,
- > but nothing short of a court decision would establish that.
-
- Why should all services on Usenet and similar entities be common carriers?
- Email - sure. Moderated newsgroups or mail distribution lists - not. Routing
- a message is one thing, storing a message for public access is another.
-
- ---
- Haakon Styri *** std. disclaimer applies ***
- Norwegian Telecom Research
-