home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.taxes
- Path: sparky!uunet!ameris!rkimm
- From: rkimm@ameris.ameritech.com (Robert L. Kimmel)
- Subject: Re: How is state tax liability figured?
- Organization: Ameritech, Hoffman Estates, IL
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:31:18 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.173118.2189@ameris.ameritech.com>
- References: <1992Nov13.182643.15057@Princeton.EDU>
- Lines: 45
-
- wirth@fine.Princeton.EDU (Colleen Wirth) writes:
-
- >Hello fellow tax payers--
-
- >The only time I ever seem to get around to reading this group is in
- >November when the evil tax man is taking bigger and bigger chunks
- >out of my measly paycheck, in an effort to make up for those 9
- >deductions I claimed back in February. I can usually figure my tax
- >burden to within $100 or so, but this year there's a hitch: I worked
- >half the year in California, and then moved to New Jersey and started
- >working and paying taxes here.
-
- >What I need to know is, do the states figure the amount of taxes I owe
- >considering ONLY the amount I made in that state, disregarding any
- >money I made in another state?
-
- >This is very important, since if I get to start again at $0 in New Jersey
- >half way through the year, I'll be in a much lower tax bracket in both
- >states. I could then use my state refunds to pay the Feds.
-
- I don't know how California works, but NJ has you determine both your "Income
- from NJ sources" and your "Income from all sources." Next compute the
- percentage of your income from NJ sources; we will use that number later.
- Now determine the NJ tax on your "Income from all sources", and multiply by the
- percentage determined above. For example:
-
- Income from all sources: $30,000
- Income from NJ sources: $12,000
- Multiplier: 40%
- NJ tax on $30,000: $650 (as of 1989; it's probably different now)
- $650 x 40%: $260
-
- I have left out the effect of personal exemptions, etc., but that should give
- you the idea. If another state had the same definition of income, same tax
- brackets, same exemptions, etc., as NJ, you would neither gain nor lose by
- earning your income in two states vs. receiving it all in one.
-
- NJ also used to have an eccentricity in its tax code that caused those who are
- "Married filing jointly" to pay quite a bit more than those who are "Married
- filing separately." I don't know whether that eccentricity is still there, or
- whether it applies to you, but be advised. The main down side is that if you
- file separately on your NJ return, you are supposed to file separately on your
- US return, which can have negative consequences, depending on one's situation.
-
- BK
-