home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.kids
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!orchard.la.locus.com!devnet.la.locus.com!judy
- From: judy@locus.com (Judy Leedom Tyrer)
- Subject: Re: nursery school questions
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.230627.2533163@locus.com>
- Organization: Locus Computing Corporation, Los Angeles, California
- References: <1992Nov17.185351.23228@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 23:06:27 GMT
- Lines: 78
-
- In article <1992Nov17.185351.23228@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> zippy@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (steven.s.albert) writes:
- >I'm just looking for some opinions. We're looking into nursery
- >schools for Billy (for next September, I can't believe how early
- >you have to start this!). Anyhow, we had thought we'd start out
- >with 2 mornings a week because we're really just looking to give
- >Billy an exposure to other kids in a group setting (without us
- >around - currently he's with Mary or me all day). He's currently
- >in a pre-nursery program 1 day a week. After an initial tough
- >adjustment, he seems to be doing pretty well there (and is quite
- >proud of his "art projects", which now decorate our refrigerator :-)).
- >
- >Now the question. We have since heard and read that 2 days
- >a week is not a good thing because of the lack of continuity and
- >that 3 days a week is much better (2.5 hours/day). I'm just looking
- >for comments or experiences with nursery schools. Billy will be 3.5
- >then, so I know he'll be quite different emotionally and maturity-wise.
- >Right now, he's very shy and tends to hang back by himself when he's in
- >a group setting and we didn't want to traumatize him by putting him into
- >a situation that he's not equipped to handle. He also has some other
- >activities that he enjoys that we want to continue him in and a 3 day
- >nursery program would mean he'd be busy every day of the week. Advice?
- >Anecdotes?
-
- One thing that struck me when we first started looking at pre-schools was
- that there were some that were actually day care centers but had a morning
- pre-school curriculum. I didn't like this for my children because it seemed
- there was a natural cliquishness built in with those that only came for the
- part day being a separate group from those that were there all day. I didn't
- like the feel of these places.
-
- I found the perfect pre-school and I knew it when I saw it. It may have been
- the large tree in the yard that they encouraged the children to climb, or
- maybe it was the floor time story telling. Or the house play areas where
- the kids could free play. Or was it the science lab with lots of insects
- and plants growing. All I knew was that it felt 100% "right". It was the
- fifth school I'd looked at.
-
- What they did was have the school split according to age group. M W F is
- all 4 year olds. T TH is all 3 year olds. Those who are in "pre-K" (old
- enough but not mature enough for Kindergarten) go M-F afternoons.
-
- We found that the two days a week was a little disjointed, but for us the
- purpose of sending a 3 YO was just to get him used to the idea of school,
- regimentation, and getting up in the morning (that was for us parents, really).
- The three days a week seems a lot more like the real thing but with a day
- of free play in between each school day so Mitchell isn't "under the gun"
- all the time. He calls his non-school days his "vacation". I think it is
- so cute.
-
- I find this a nice interlude for school. It helps us as parents get used to
- having to get up and get the kids ready for school but still gives us two
- days a week to chill out and sleep in. And Mitchell adores school. He is
- excited that next year he gets to go every day that Mommy works.
-
- So I disagree about 2 days a week being too little. It was perfect for us.
-
- >
- >I don't know about him, but *I* feel the stress! Tying this into the
- >"growing up" thread, how many of you find that your children have grown
- >up faster than your ability to cope (i.e. you've finally figured out how
- >to deal with the stage that just ended :-))? My first inclination is to
- >protect him from everything and it takes all of my willpower to let
- >him experience some things firsthand...(his personality is very close
- >to mine so I can make some pretty good guesses about what's in store
- >for him as he grows up).
-
- I have a sure fire cure for this syndrome. We call it "the second child".
- That way you get to reexperience that stage you've just mastered (only to
- find that it is different for every child, sigh), and you don't have time
- to protect your firstborn from "everything". In fact, having a second child
- has made me feel grateful to have my children growing up. I love age 4. I
- look forward to Erin getting there (we've had 3 years of living with 2 yo
- behavior and, quite frankly, I've had enough of it now ;-)
-
- --
- Judy Leedom Tyrer
-
- "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" - William Blake
-