home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ukma!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu (Rich Winkel)
- Subject: Palestinian deportation case tests immigration law
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.005921.6532@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: PACH
- Distribution: na
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:59:21 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 125
-
- /** mideast.action: 37.0 **/
- ** Topic: IPS:U.S.: Palestinian deportations **
- ** Written 10:34 pm Nov 16, 1992 by pnmideast in cdp:mideast.action **
- From: <pnmideast>
- Subject: IPS:U.S.: Palestinian deportations
-
- /* Written 12:04 am Nov 14, 1992 by newsdesk@igc.apc.org in igc:ips.englibrary */
- /* ---------- "UNITED STATES: Palestinian deportat" ---------- */
- Copyright Inter Press Service 1992, all rights reserved. Permission to re-
- print within 7 days of original date only with permission from 'newsdesk'.
-
- Area: Asia, eastern
- Title: UNITED STATES: Palestinian deportation case tests immigration law
-
-
- an inter press service feature
-
- by jane hunter
-
- sacramento, california, nov 11 (ips) -- a deportation case against
- two palestinians in los angeles marks the first test of a
- controversial u.s. immigration law which the government says
- denies non-citizens the constitutionally protected rights to free
- speech and association.
-
- if the government prevails in its claim that it can deport
- khader hamide and michel shehadeh for raising money for
- palestinian causes, all non-citizens campaigning for social change
- in their native lands would be liable for deportation, according
- to attorneys for the nation's leading constitutional rights
- organisations which are representing the palestinians.
-
- hamide, 38, and shehadeh, 36, both longtime residents of the
- united states, were arrested in jan. 1987 along with five other
- palestinians and hamide's kenyan wife. they were held without bail
- in high security prisons for two weeks until a judge --unswayed by
- the government's argument that they posed a threat to national
- security -- released them on their own recognizance.
-
- none of the group, widely known as the 'l.a. eight', was ever
- charged with a criminal offence. instead, the government began
- deportation efforts, charging six of them with technical visa
- violations and trying several times to expel hamide and shehadeh
- on political grounds.
-
- at the opening of the trial in late october, marc van der hout
- of the national lawyers' guild (nlg) noted the government had so
- far brought four sets of charges against the two.
-
- this time, the government is trying to prove that hamide and
- shehadeh ran afoul of a section of the 1990 immigration act which
- prohibits non-citizens from providing ''material support'' to a
- terrorist organisation.
-
- although it has refused to make public the details of the
- evidence it says it has, the justice department has accused the
- palestinians of providing material support to the popular front
- for the liberation of palestine (pflp), part of the palestine
- liberation organisation (plo).
-
- hamide and shehadeh deny belonging to the pflp. and their
- attorneys claim that the 1990 statute was not intended to cover
- funds raised for such activities as health or cultural and social
- programmes in the israeli-occupied territories. (more/ips)
-
- united states: palestinian deportation case tests immigration law(2-e)
-
- united states: palestinian deportation (2)
-
- during opening arguments in the case, david cole of the new
- york-based centre for constitutional rights (ccr), contentended:
- ''if you are a palestinian and you want to support your people
- back home, as a practical matter, you have to send your money
- through the plo and its constituent organisations. there is simply
- no reasonable alternative''.
-
- duke austin, a spokesperson for the immigration and
- naturalisation service (ins) in washington said the case will
- hinge on whether a non-citizen is allowed to provide political
- support to groups outside the united states that are ''tied to
- terrorism''.
-
- in a telephone interview with ips, austin said the ins expected
- the case to clarify what, under the 1990 law, ''are the full
- panoply of rights of someone not a citizen''.
-
- the american civil liberties union (aclu) and some of the other
- 70 civil and constitutional rights groups that have formed the
- committee for justice to support the 'l.a. eight' have argued
- strongly against the government's position.
-
- in a statement, the american immigration lawyers' association
- called the trial ''an assault on the crucial rights of non-
- citizens and...a throwback to guilt by association'', a reference
- to the mccarthy-era immigration law which the 1990 act replaced.
-
- the government devoted the first two weeks of its case to an
- attempt to establish that the pflp was a terrorist organisation.
- its main witness, ariel merari, an adviser to the israeli prime
- minister and the israeli defence forces, describes himself as an
- anti-terrorism expert.
-
- judge bruce einhorn permitted prosecutors to accredit merari as
- an expert witness on international terrorism, telling defence
- attorneys their strenuous objections would be appropriate later in
- the proceedings.
-
- defence lawyers and the committee for justice, however,
- challenged merari as an expert, saying he can neither speak nor
- read arabic and lacks any broad knowledge of palestinian affairs.
-
- yet to be addressed, van der hout told ips last week, is the
- 1990 statute's use of the word ''terrorism'', which he contended
- was ''unconstitutionally vague''. the law defines neither
- ''terrorism'' nor what a ''terrorist organisation'' might be.
-
- the trial, which is set to resume next month after recessing
- last week, may yet be affected by the incoming administration of
- president-elect bill clinton.
-
- ''we hope a new justice department will take a look and see
- that the bush administration's interpretation of the law is
- entirely unreasonable,'' van der hout told ips. (end/ips/jh/yjc/92)
-
- ** End of text from cdp:mideast.action **
-