home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!daemon
- From: Ofer Inbar <cos%chaos.cs.brandeis.edu@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
- Subject: Police raid of 2600 meeting (CU Digest #4.57)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.010055.26360@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: daemon@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: Brandeis University Computer Science
- Resent-From: "Rich Winkel" <MATHRICH@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:00:55 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 976
-
- This is a forwarded copy of Computer Underground Digest #4.57, and
- includes copies of articles from the commercial news service
- NewsBytes. If you repost this article to anywhere, please post it in
- its entirety. Thanks.
-
- This issue of CuD focuses on a police raid that broke up a 2600
- meeting. 2600 is a quarterly magazine for hackers, and more details
- on 2600's meetings are in one of the articles below.
-
- -- Cos (Ofer Inbar) -- cos@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu
-
-
- Forwarded message:
- >Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 22:01 CST
- >To: TK0JUT1@NIU.BITNET
- >From: TK0JUT2%NIU.bitnet@UICVM.UIC.EDU
- >Subject: Cu Digest, #4.57
-
- Computer underground Digest Wed Nov 11, 1992 Volume 4 : Issue 57
-
- Editors: Jim Thomas and Gordon Meyer (TK0JUT2@NIU.BITNET)
- Archivist: Brendan Kehoe
- Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth
- Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala
- Coyp Editor: Etaion Shrdlu, Junior
-
- CONTENTS, #4.57 (Nov 11, 1992)
- File 1--2600 Meeting Disrupted by Secret Service?
- FIle 2--2600 Meeting Disrupted by Law Enforcement
- FIle 3--Reports Of "Raid" On 2600 Washington Meeting
- FIle 4--More first-hand Accounts
- FIle 5--Confusion About Secret Service Role In "2600 Washington Raid"
- FIle 6--Conflicting Stories In 2600 Raid; CRSR Files FOIA
- FIle 7--Transcript from Al Johnson Interview
-
- Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are
- available at no cost from tk0jut2@mvs.cso.niu.edu. The editors may be
- contacted by voice (815-753-6430), fax (815-753-6302) or U.S. mail at:
- Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL 60115.
-
- Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest
- news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of
- LAWSIG, and DL0 and DL12 of TELECOM; on Genie in the PF*NPC RT
- libraries; from America Online in the PC Telecom forum under
- "computing newsletters;" on the PC-EXEC BBS at (414) 789-4210; in
- Europe from the ComNet in Luxembourg BBS (++352) 466893; and using
- anonymous FTP on the Internet from ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in
- /pub/cud, red.css.itd.umich.edu (141.211.182.91) in /cud, halcyon.com
- (192.135.191.2) in /pub/mirror/cud, and ftp.ee.mu.oz.au (128.250.77.2)
- in /pub/text/CuD.
- European readers can access the ftp site at: nic.funet.fi pub/doc/cud.
- Back issues also may be obtained from the mail
- server at mailserv@batpad.lgb.ca.us.
- European distributor: ComNet in Luxembourg BBS (++352) 466893.
-
- COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing
- information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of
- diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long
- as the source is cited. Some authors do copyright their material, and
- they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that
- non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise
- specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles
- relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are
- preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts
- unless absolutely necessary.
-
- DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent
- the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all
- responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not
- violate copyright protections.
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- >Date: Wed 11 Nov 1992 18:23:55
- >From: Moderators<tk0jut2@mvs.cso.niu.edu>
- >Subject: File 1--2600 Meeting Disrupted by Secret Service?
-
- On Friday, November 6, the Washington, D.C. 2600 meeting took place at
- the Pentagon City Mall, but was broken up by mall security police.
- There is preliminary evidence that the disruption may have involved
- the United States Secret Service. If the USSS was involved in using
- private security forces to disrupt civilians, their action appears to
- not only exceed its mandate, but to be blatantly illegal. The
- followings posts describe the details, but the basic facts are these:
-
- 1. The Mall's private security police appeared to engage in a
- well-organized and well-coordinated sweep of those participating in
- the meeting. Although there are restrictions that may limit gatherings
- on mall property, there was no apparent indication that the sweep was
- prompted by such restrictions.
-
- 2. The Mall's head of security, Al Johnson (703-415-3410) claimed
- that the FBI and USSS "ramrodded" the operation. Although he has since
- denied making the claim, his comments were recorded by Brock Meeks, a
- reporter for CommDaily. Meeks subsequently called both the FBI and
- Secret Service. The FBI denied any participation. Meeks' report of
- the USSS response suggests they were present at the time. We have read
- a transcript of Al Johnson's response to Meeks, and Johnson explicitly
- and unequivocally states that he considered it a USSS operation and
- that as far as he's concerned, the mall police are "out of it," and he
- referred Meeks to the USSS (See transcript in file #7).
-
- 3. Either Al Johnson is lying or Meeks fabricated the tape. Meeks is
- a highly respected journalist known for accuracy and credibility. His
- integrity has never been questioned, and we find it incomprehensible
- that he fabricated the tape. It seems more likely that Johnson either
- glibly named external agencies to cover up the actions of security
- forces or that he initially spoke the truth then realized (or was
- told) that he should not indicate external involvement. The USSS's
- response, which appears to make them complicit in, if not initiaters
- of, the action, indicates, as John McMullen's final article reveals,
- that they were fully aware of the incident.
-
- 4. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) has filed a
- Freedom of Information request with the USSS in an attempt to obtain
- further information of USSS involvement.
-
- If, in fact, the USSS was involved, it reflects an outrageous and
- totally unacceptable abuse of authority and power. If they were
- involved, it indicates that they have learned little from the
- Operation Sun Devil abuses and that it is time to curtail their power.
- If they were involved, their actions represent a direct challenge to
- Constitutional principles of freedom of speech and assembly.
-
- If those attending the 2600 meeting violated mall policies against
- assembly that limit the size and nature of public gatherings, it is
- fully legitimate for mall security personnel to intervene. However,
- if the intervention was a premediated action in which the USSS
- participated, then the forces designated to protect the Constitution
- have over-stepped their bounds and threaten once again to subvert the
- principles they are sworn to protect.
-
- This is not simply a cyberspace issue. If the USSS was involved, it
- raises the issue of the relationship between government police actions
- and the Constitutional freedoms that ostensibly protect us against
- unwarranted control of basic rights. It is an issue that should be of
- concern to everyone. Slippery slopes are highly dangerous terrain.
-
- The following posts provide additional details. The Newsbytes pieces
- are reproduced here with permission.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- >Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 08:52:13 -0500
- >From: emmanuel@well.sf.ca.us
- >Subject: File 2--2600 Meeting Disrupted by Law Enforcement
-
- On Friday, November 6th, the 2600 meeting in Washington DC was
- disrupted by assorted law enforcement people. Details are still coming
- in at this point but there are some details that have been
- corroborated by a number of people. This is what we know: Shortly
- after the gathering commenced at the Pentagon City Mall, the 30 or so
- people who were there were surrounded by mall security who demanded
- that everyone consent to searches. They were told that if they refused
- to be searched, they'd be arrested. Everyone's bags were gone through
- and lots of personal property was confiscated including notebooks,
- school work, various tools, a computer keyboard, and many other items.
- The security guards were in radio contact with others on a balcony who
- had been watching the group. One of the attendees was detained by
- security who would neither arrest him nor let him go. After about 10
- minutes, he was released. Some property was returned but much was not.
- No receipts were given and, at one point, the security guards denied
- having anything at all. They then said that if they did have anything,
- the attendees would have to return the next week with proof of
- ownership. The mall police were later joined by local Virginia police,
- who told the group they would be arrested if they didn't leave the
- mall immediately. In addition to searching everybody, the police took
- down the names of everyone present.
-
- At this point it doesn't look as if there was anything illegal going
- on or anything illegal in anyone's possession. It also should be noted
- that the mall police said they were acting on behalf of the Secret
- Service. The local police would only say they were gathering
- information for an "outside party".
-
- The following is from Bob Stratton, one of our people on the scene:
-
- I hope that someone like Inhuman might be able to fill in the details,
- but just as a brief...
-
- +++++
-
- I showed up late to the 2600 meeting in DC tonight, and I found
- everyone outside on the sidewalk instead of in the food court of the
- normal meeting place. Evidently they were hassled severely by the mall
- security officers, who took ID, confiscated all manner of property,
- tore up the list of officers' names being compiled by one attendee,
- and threatened to confiscate a camera being used by one attendee to
- record the whole fiasco.
-
- The real police were called, and evidently made but a cursory
- appearance, though some comment about working with the Secret Service
- was made. The worst thing is that the private security officers who
- took property later denied it, and people are now in a quandary as to
- the best mechanism for recovery of their property.
-
- I was fortunate enough to have missed the worst of it, though I
- do regret that I wasn't there earlier if only to tell the rent-a-cops
- what I thought of them, and my knowledge of my rights.
-
- I know that several of the attendees called up to New York, to
- Emmanuel Goldstein, and I'm interested in hearing his take on things.
-
- Film at 11.
-
- --Strat
-
- ------------------------------
-
- >Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 09:17:34
- >From: jmcmullen@well.sf.ca.us
- >Subject: File 3--Reports Of "Raid" On 2600 Washington Meeting
-
- ((The following will appear on Newsbytes tomorrow. Newsbytes is a
- commercial copyrighted service and this article is posted with the
- express permission of the author (reposting is prohibited)))
-
- WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A., 1992 NOV 7 (NB) -- Eric Corley, a/k/a
- "Emmanuel Goldstein", editor and publisher of 2600 Magazine: The
- Hacker Quarterly has told Newsbytes that the Friday, November November
- 6th 2600 meeting held in the Pentagon City Mall, outside of
- Washington, DC. was disrupted by threats of arrest by mall security
- officers and Arlington, VA police.
-
- 2600 Magazine promotes monthly meetings of hackers, press and other
- interested parties throughout the country. The meetings are held in
- public locations on the first Friday evening of the month and the
- groups often contact each other by telephone during the meetings.
- Corley told Newsbytes that meetings were held that evening in New
- York, Washington, Philadelphia, Cambridge, St. Louis, Chicago, Los
- Angeles and San Francisco. Corley said "While I am sure that meetings
- have been observed by law enforcement agencies, this is the only time
- that we have been harassed. It is definitely a freedom of speech
- issue."
-
- According to Craig Neidorf, who was present at the meeting handing out
- applications for Computer Professionals For Social Responsibility
- (CPSR), "I saw the security officers focusing on us. Then they started
- to come toward us from a number of directions under what seemed to be
- the direction of a person with a walkie-talkie on a balcony. When they
- approached, I left the group and observed the security personnel
- encircling the group of about 30 gatherers. The group was mainly
- composed of high school and college students. The guards demanded to
- search the knapsacks and bags of the gatherers. They confiscated
- material, including CPSR applications, a copy of Mondo 2000 (a
- magazine) and other material. They also confiscated film from a
- person trying to take pictures of the guards and, when a hacker called
- "HackRat" attempted to copy down the names of the guards, they took
- his pencil and paper."
-
- Neidorf continued, "I left to go outside and rejoined the group when
- they were ejected from the mall. The guards continued challenging the
- group and told them that they would be arrested if they returned. When
- one of the people began to take pictures of the guards, the apparent
- supervisor became excited and threatening but did not confiscate the
- film."
-
- Neidorf also said "I think that the raid was planned. They hit right
- about 6:00 and they identified our group as "hackers" and said that
- they knew that this group met every month."
-
- Neidorf's story was supported by a Washington "hacker" called
- "Inhuman", who told Newsbytes "I arrived at the meeting late and saw
- the group being detained by the guards. I walked along with the group
- as they were being ushered out and when I asked a person who seemed to
- be in authority his name, he pointed at a badge with his name written
- in script on it. I couldn't make out the name and, when I mentioned
- that to the person, he said 'If you can't read it, too bad.' I did
- read his name, 'C. Thomas', from another badge."
-
- Inhuman also told Newsbytes that, while he did not hear it said, he
- was told by a number of people that the guards said that they were
- 'acting on behalf of the Secret Service. "I was also told that there
- were two police officers there from the Arlington County Police
- present but I did not see them."
-
- Another attendee, Doug Luce posted an account of his on an NY BBS and
- gave Newsbytes permission to quote Luce wrote "I also got to the DC
- meeting very late; 7:45 or so. It seemed like a coordinated harassment
- episode, not geared toward busting anyone, but designed to get people
- riled up, and maybe not come back to the mall. A couple of the things
- I overheard: someone had brought a keyboard to sell, and the cops had
- harassed him about it, saying 'You aren't selling anything in my mall
- without a vendors permit!' Blaize (another attendee) says that maybe
- his handcuffing Hack Rat might have set the cops off; or maybe it was
- the Whisper 2000 that the cops were convinced was a stun gun. The word
- is that there was stuff taken and not given back, wires and soldering
- tools. There is also the rumor that the cops were going through
- everyone's bags and belongings, and that some people were detained.
- While the thrust of the effort seemed to be mall security, there are
- conflicting reports about supporting personnel. Some people said that
- the SS (Secret Service) might have been there, others thought the FBI
- or plainclothes city officers were assisting (or coordinating).
- Supposedly, several of them had removed their name tags before moving
- in."
-
- Luce's reference to possible Secret Service involvement was supported
- by a 19 year-old college student known as the "Lithium Bandit", who
- told Newsbytes "I got to the mall about 6:15 and saw the group being
- detained by approximately 5 Arlington County police and 5 security
- guards. When I walked over to see what was going on, a security guard
- asked me for an ID and I refused to show it saying that I was about to
- leave. The guard said that I couldn't leave and told me that I had to
- see a police officer. When I did, the officer demanded ID and, when I
- once again refused, informed me that I could be detained for up to 10
- hours for refusing to produce identification. I gave in and produced
- my school ID which the police gave to the security people who copied
- down my name and social security number."
-
- Lithium Bandit continued "When I asked the police what was behind this
- action, I was told that they couldn't answer but that "the Secret
- Service is involved and we are within our rights doing this. I and
- some others later went to the Arlington police station to attempt to
- get more information. I was told only that there was a report of the
- use of a stolen credit card and 2 officers sent to investigate -- they
- later admitted that it was 5. While I was detained, I heard no mention
- of a credit card and there was no one arrested."
-
- Marc Rotenberg, director of CPSR's Washington office, told Newsbytes
- "I have really no details on the incident yet but I am very concerned
- about the reports and confiscation of CPSR applications, if true, is
- outrageous. I will find out more facts on Monday.
-
- Newsbytes was told by the Pentagon City Mall office that any
- information concerning the action would have to come from the director
- of security, Al Johnson, who will not be available until Monday. The
- Arlington Country Police referred Newsbytes to a "press briefing
- recording" which had not been updated since the morning before the
- incident.
-
- Corley told Newsbytes "there have been no reports of misbehavior by
- any of these people. They were obviously singled out because they were
- hackers. It's as if they were being singled out as an ethnic group. I
- admire the way the group responded -- in a courteous fashion but it is
- inexcusable that it happened. I will be at the next Washington meeting
- to insure that it doesn't happen again."
-
- The manager of one of New York state's largest malls provided
- background information to Newsbytes on the rights of malls to police
- those on mall property, saying "The primary purpose of a mall is to
- sell. The interior of the mall is private property and is subject to
- the regulations of the mall. The only requirement is that the
- regulations be enforced in an even-handed manner. I do not allow
- political activities in my mall so I could not make an exception for
- Democrats. We do allow community groups to meet but they must request
- space at least two weeks before the meeting and must have proper
- insurance. Our regulations also say that groups of more than 4 may not
- congregate in the mall. We would ask groups larger than that to
- disperse. We would also ask for identification from those who violate
- our regulations so that we may bar them from the mall for a period of
- 6 months."
-
- She added "Some people feel that mall atriums and food courts are
- public space. They are not and the industry is united on this. If the
- malls were to receive tax benefits for the common space and public
- service in snow removal and the like, it could possibly be a public
- area but malls are taxed on the entire space and are totally private
- property, subject to their own regulations. If a group of 20 or more
- congregated in my mall, they would be asked to leave."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- >Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 08:52:13 -0500
- >From: emmanuel@well.sf.ca.us
- >Subject: File 4--More first-hand Accounts
-
- ((MODERATORS NOTE: The following first-hand accounts were collected
- by Emmanuel Goldstein, editor of 2600)).
-
- ***************
- ACCOUNT #1:
-
-
- This is my personal statement as to exactly what happened during the
- DC 2600 raid on Friday, November 7th 1992. Granted I cannot remember
- the exact dialogue that was exchanged, I will get the general meaning
- of everything said and done, by both parties.
-
- I arrived at the 2600 meeting, with Loki, at approximately
- 4:30pm. We headed towards the food court after looking throughout a
- few electronics stores in interest to grab a bite to eat. After
- eating, we proceeded to the fourth floor, to scope out on everything
- before the meeting actually started. On the way up to the fourth
- floor, we ran into Tomellicas. We consulted for a few minutes, and
- then all went up to the fourth floor. We continued to hang out on the
- fourth floor, and then we saw Albatross back down on the first floor,
- so we hollered on got his attention, then proceeded back up to the
- fourth floor. Shortly after, Psionic Nemesis arrived on the scene.
- We continued to hang out, then proceeded back to the first floor.
-
- After arriving down on the first floor, we moved tables together,
- rearranged the seating layout, then proceeded with the meeting.
- Knight Lightning arrived a little before 6:00 and handed out some
- literature, along with a kooky little button. People slowly arrived,
- and the meeting was underway.
-
- At this point, the fed scene started to pick up drastically.
- Tomellicas was snapping pictures of every single fed (or what appeared
- to be) there. After chatting for awhile longer, Techno Caster, Hack
- Rat, and a few others arrived (maybe not in that order). Hack Rat
- came over to my table, or part of the table, where I slapped my
- handcuffs that I had brought on him. At this time, Techno Caster had
- showed his Whisper 2000 to Metal Head. Immediately there after,
- several members of the Mall Security task force <chuckle> surrounded
- the area, demanding to see the 'stun gun'. Naturally denying
- everything about a stun gun, the hostility grew. Finally one of the
- guards saw what they thought was the stun gun, and pointed at the
- Whisper 2000, which was in the hands of (I think) Metal Head. Metal
- Head told the officers "This? This is *the* Whisper 2000!", the guard
- examined it, questioned what we had it for, and basically just
- pestered us some more.
-
- One of the guards (who seemed to be the leader at this point) came
- over across the table from me, and was looking at the stuff on the
- center of the table, in front of Loki and myself. Then, over his
- walkie-talkie, I heard them say something about handcuffs. Without
- hesitating, the guard said "Who has the handcuffs?", I then said "I
- do." At this point the guard was examining my handcuffs, and
- questioned me as to why I had them. Basically telling him just
- because I felt like it, did nothing but aggravate him, and the
- situation. He then asked me to produce identification. I asked as to
- why and the discussion went on for about sixty seconds, when I just
- decided to give him my ID because I was just plain sick of this
- ignorant discussion. He copied everything down from it, and asked me
- what my name was. I simply asked him if he was having trouble reading
- it, and he sneered at me. At this point, the rest of the guards
- started taking identification from others. The guard who had took my
- ID had asked Loki, sitting right across one side of the table from me,
- to see the contents of his backpack. Loki declined, and the guard
- asked again. The guard switched topics, and asked Loki to produce
- identification. Loki then handed him about 4 different forms of ID,
- the only thing he was missing was a birth certificate. The guard
- asked to see the contents of his bag, and once again Loki declined.
- The argument went back and forth for another minute or two, when Loki
- boldly exclaimed "You cannot search my bag, but I will show you what
- is in it." Loki proceeded to show him everything in the bag at this
- point. After pulling a few things that looked very suspicious to the
- guard out of his bag (read: after pulling a few soldered connections,
- a bundle of phone cable, and a couple of electronic devices out of his
- bag...). At this time, I turned to my left to see a rather large guy
- wearing a nice suit who appeared to be taking over the command of the
- rent-a-cops. I immediately asked him his name, or two see some form
- of identification after he was doing the same to other people at the
- meeting. He flat out said "No.". So I just sighed at the entire
- ignorance of the man. Tomellicas quickly snapped a few pictures of
- him, and other guards there who wouldn't identify themselves. The
- guard literally took the film out of Tomellicas's camera at this
- point. Hack Rat had proceeded to make a list of the guards names who
- were involved. After the guards noticed this, they took the list Hack
- Rat had compiled, and ripped it up, keeping the shreds. At this
- point, on the other side of my table, I watched Loki zipping his bag
- back up after having a few things taken out of it. The big guy in the
- suit came and studied the stuff that had been taken out of his bag and
- asked Loki what he was doing with it. After exchanging words for
- about 2 minutes, the big guy proceeded to research Loki's bag. Noted
- that Loki gave no permission for the guy to search it, he just plain
- started going through it. At this point I wanted my handcuffs back,
- and I was out of there. I couldn't handle this sort of police
- harassment and basic bullshit. I told the guard I wanted my handcuffs
- back, and he refused. I asked for a receipt, and he refused. I said
- "I'm leaving, I have better things to do than to be harassed by a
- buncha rent-a-cops." <granted under my breath, but he still heard me>
- he proceeded to say "Sit back down.". At this point I just figured I
- might as well do whatever they wanted so I could just go home and see
- the Bulls game.
-
- This irrelevant search continued to go on for roughly a little
- less than two hours. None of the guards would give us any reason for
- why we were being detained, or why we were being searched. After
- sitting there for roughly two hours, we were all starting to get a
- little (lot) uptight about the whole situation and starting demanding
- we know why we were being held there and searched. One of the guards
- said that he thought we had a stun gun and that's why we were being
- searched. I made it really clear to him that (a) stun guns are not
- illegal in the state of virginia, and (b) after we showed him what he
- (they) saw, and he saw that it was hardly a stun gun, but an amplified
- sound device for deaf people, that he had no right to search us any
- further, let alone everyone there.
-
- Denying that these laws were infact true, he told me to shut up.
- Laughing at his idiocy, I just sat there, preparing for hari-kari.
- Finally, after about another thirty minutes of bullshit, we were told
- to leave the mall immediately. Not understanding why, myself and
- others questioned him as to why we were being detained, searched, and
- kicked out. He gave no reason, except to say that this was private
- property, and that if we did not leave, we would be arrested, by the
- one Arlington County cop now on the scene. Just wanting to go see the
- Bulls game, I proceeded to leave, with Hack Rat, Tomellicas, and
- someone else who I forgot was at this time. We left the scene, and
- proceeded to Crystal City Underground, where we met up with Techno
- Caster and a couple others discussing the torment we had all just
- experienced.
-
- Let alone the embarrassment of all the people watching us over the
- balcony.
-
- Saturday, November 7th, 1992. Hack Rat and I thought it would be wise
- to contact the Pentagon Mall Security office on three-way. I called
- information, obtained the number (703/415-3410). I called the number
- and a lady picked up on the other end. I told her that I would like
- to speak with whoever was in charge, or present at the raid in the
- food court last night. She told me that nobody was there, they were
- either sick, or not working today. I told her "Out of the roughly 8
- people there last night, they are all sick? That's bullshit. I want
- to speak with someone who was there last night, or I want all of the
- officers names, and the name of the person in charge." She told me
- I'd have to call back in 30 minutes. I wait.
-
- Thirty minutes later, Hack Rat and I call back. The same lady answers
- and I ask to speak to someone present, or the man in charge of the
- food court raid last night. She said please hold. I was transfered
- somewhere. A man picked up the phone, this voice was very familiar,
- and I could easily match it with the guy who took my handcuffs from
- me, the one who told me to shut up. I asked him what his name was,
- and the names of everyone there, and of whoever was in charge. He
- said that he was not allowed to give that information out. After
- dealing with the idiocy for another 5 minutes, tension grew along with
- the hostility.
-
- After a little more social engineering, I was able to bs a name out of
- him. Al Johnson, who was supposedly the head of security.
-
- After this, I called up Loki. We called Fenris Wolf on three way.
- Fenris told us that one of his parental units called the mall security
- office to find that Loki's bag had been 'turned over to federal
- authorities'.
-
- Loki, never given a receipt for his bag, even after asking, was
- extremely pissed at this point.
-
- The Mad Hatter
-
- *************************************
-
- ACCOUNT #2:
-
- dead cow #16 @1 [imic]
-
- Sun Nov 08 15:21:42 1992
-
- here's my story, as i witnessed it.
-
- i was coming down the escalator when i noticed that there were a
- bunch of people standing around and all these cops in the center. so i
- rushed up to the center and asked the cops what was going on. the cop
- said "i have nothing to say to you" so i asked who i could talk to. he
- said that nobody had anything to say, that no one would talk to me.
- then i was questioned about my relation to this group. i denied any
- relation. i was then asked to leave, at which point i moved over to a
- group of 2600 people standing at a distance observing. i attempted to
- ask them what was going on, but at that point the mall cop wearing a
- bike outfit (what was with that guy?) asked us to leave. i walked most
- of the way to the door then stopped to remove my camera from my bag,
- meanwhile asking if i could stay long enough to use the bathroom. they
- told me that i had to use the metro bathroom. i said that i didn't
- think there was one. they said yes, ask the attendant. i then got my
- camera out and asked if i could take a picture. the guard said, in a
- threatening voice, that if i took his pic he would take my film. i put
- the camera in my pocket. i had a couple of old motherboards in my
- hands, they asked me what they were, i said they were old
- motherboards, they asked each other if (some guy who's name i didn't
- catch) would be interested in these. i said they could have them if
- they wanted, they were worth about $2. they said, no, they weren't
- gonna take them, just leave. i stalled a few more times, and then they
- said that if i stalled one mor time i would be arrested. i left the
- mall at that pt.
-
- we then went up the metro escalator, and stood around in a group at
- the top of the escalator. the mall cops were there, in the mall
- driveway, in their car. at some point, a group of mall cops came out
- and were very belligerent with someone. i stood back at a distance and
- took a picture, then turned away and started walking. the cops yelled
- after me, i gave my camera to another person. they wanted my film, i
- said i didn't have the camera. gentry jumped in and started arguing
- with the man, telling him that it was legal to take the picture. the
- man became very angry with gentry, and then started yelling about how
- he was here not to warn us about leaving the area, but to tell us to
- move our cars (all our cars were parked someplace else) from the curb,
- where there were SOME cars, because the arlington cops were coming. we
- said that we didn't have any cars, and he ignored that and proceded to
- warn us again. then he turned and gestured at gentry with his hand. at
- the same point gentry brought his hand up to scratch his head, and the
- hands met. the mall cop became very angry and told gentry that if he
- touched the mall cop again he would do some thing (i forget the
- threat) then we started talking about the camera, and the mall cop
- denied that he had ever wanted the film. after that, the mall cop
- left. then we left.
-
- that's what happened..
-
- dc
-
- +++++++++++++
-
- ACCOUNT #3:
-
- Inhuman November 8th, 1992
-
- What follows is my account of the events as I observed them at
- Pentagon City Fashion Center Mall on the evening of Friday, November
- 6th.
-
- I arrived at the mall around 6:45 p.m., almost two hours after the
- meeting began. I recognized a group of people on the food court to be
- part of the meeting and started heading towards them. At this point,
- I noticed that there were several mall security personnel and perhaps
- other law enforcement officials (I'm not sure) spread throughout the
- meeting area. Most were just standing there, some were talking to the
- meeting-goers.
-
- Since nothing too dangerous seemed to be happening, I walked into
- the middle of the meeting area, looking at all the guards. I asked
- one of the meeting-goers what was going on and he said "We're being
- detained." I then asked one of the guards (a young caucasian blonde
- male in a blue spandex biking outfit) what was going on. He replied,
- "You'll find out from your friends afterwards. Why don't you go wait
- with your friends over there.", indicating the group of people I
- entered the mall with.
-
- I left the food court. Some of the guards looked slightly upset that
- I was leaving, but made no move to stop me. I waited out-of-view of
- the food court for about five minutes and then returned. At this
- point, meeting-goers were just beginning to leave the food court area
- in the direction of the mall exit, apparently having been released
- from their detention. Guards remained on the outskirts of the group,
- directing them towards the exit.
-
- I asked one of the guards (a middle-aged heavy-set
- african-american male) if we had to leave, and he said yes. When I
- protested, he threatened to arrest me for trespassing since "this is
- private property." When I asked what his name was, he pointed to his
- name tag. The name tag had nothing more than a legal signature on it,
- which was quite unreadable. When asked him what his name was again,
- explaining that I couldn't read his name tag, he said, "You can't read
- my name tag? Too bad." Then I noticed he had another name tag with
- "C. Thomas" clearly printed on it. At this point, Dead Cow, who was
- nearby, asked if he could take the guard's picture. The guard said
- that if he did, he would take the film out of the camera. When then
- left the mall, along with the rest of the group.
-
- We waited in the Metrorail (D.C. public transportation) access
- tunnel directly outside of the mall for a while, gathering information
- from each other and deciding on a course of action.
-
- We went upstairs and outside, to a small bank of payphones near
- the Metro entrance and near the mall's outside entrance. One of the
- meeting-goers, Lithium Bandit, called the Washington Post and
- recounted the story, hoping to get a reporter to the scene. They said
- they would call back if they were interested. Several suggestions
- were made to call News Channel 8, a cable 24-hours-a-day local news
- channel, but the call was never made. About twenty of us remained at
- this point, there having been around forty total.
-
- About ten minutes later, the mall security guards reappeared. I
- was on the phone with Emmanuel Goldstein at the time, so I didn't see
- the initial interactions, and I'm still not clear what they were
- trying to tell us to do this time, as we were no longer on private
- property. At some point, Dead Cow took his camera out and took a
- couple pictures of the scene. At this, the guards, especially C.
- Thomas, became incensed. Thomas demanded the film, somehow claiming
- that Dead Cow was not allowed to take a picture of him. The film
- remained in our possesion. Then Gentry, another meeting-goer, began
- to get in an argument with C. Thomas over Dead Cow's right to take his
- picture, and the general rights violations that had occured already.
- At some point, Gentry apparently touched C. Thomas in an inadvertent
- manner. Thomas then yelled very loudly, "Don't TOUCH me!" and made
- some threat about what he would do if Gentry touched him again.
-
- People began to leave now, to regroup at the Crystal City
- Underground, including me, so thus ends my account.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- >Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 09:17:35
- >From: jmcmullen@well.sf.ca.us
- >Subject: File 5--Confusion About Secret Service Role D.C. "Raid"
-
- ((The following will appear on Newsbytes. Newsbytes is a copyrighted
- commercial service and its material may not be reproduced. This
- article is posted with the express permission of the authors.))
-
- WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A., 1992 NOV 7 (NB) -- In the aftermath of an
- action on Friday, November 6th by members of the Pentagon City Mall
- Police and police from Arlington County, VA in which those attending a
- 2600 meeting at the mall were ordered from the premises, conflicting
- stories continue to appear.
-
- Attendees at the meeting have contended to Newsbytes that members of
- the mall police told them that they were "acting on behalf of the
- Secret Service.". They also maintain that the mall police confiscated
- material from knapsacks and took film from someone attempting to
- photograph the action and a list of the names of security officers
- that one attendee was attempting to compile.
-
- Al Johnson, chief of security for the mall, denied these allegations
- to Newsbytes, saying "No one said that we were acting on behalf of the
- Secret Service. We were merely enforcing our regulations. While the
- group was not disruptive, it had pulled tables together and was having
- a meeting in our food court area. The food court is for people eating
- and is not for meetings. We therefore asked the people to leave."
-
- Johnson denied that security personnel took away any film or lists and
- further said "We did not confiscate any material. The group refused to
- own up to who owned material on the tables and in the vicinity so we
- collected it as lost material. If it turns out that anything did
- belong to any of those people, they are welcome to come in and, after
- making proper identification, take the material."
-
- In a conversation early on November 9th, Robert Rasor, Secret Service
- agent-in-charge of computer crime investigations, told Newsbytes that
- having mall security forces represent the Secret Service is not
- something that was done and, that to his knowledge, the Secret Service
- had no involvement with any Pentagon City mall actions on the previous
- Friday.
-
- A Newsbytes call to the Arlington County police was returned by a
- Detective Nuneville who said that her instructions were to refer all
- questions concerning the matter to agent David Adams of the Secret
- Service. She told Newsbytes that Adams would be providing all
- information concerning the involvement of both the Arlington Police
- and the Secret Service in the incident.
-
- Adams told Newsbytes "The mall police were not acting as agents for
- the Secret Service. Beyond that, I can not confirm or deny that there
- is an ongoing investigation."
-
- Adams also told Newsbytes that "While I cannot speak for the Arlington
- police, I understand that their involvement was due to an incident
- unrelated to the investigation."
-
- Marc Rotenberg, director of the Washington office of Computer
- Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR), told Newsbytes "CPSR
- has reason to believe that the detention of people at the Pentagon
- City Mall last Friday was undertaken at the behest of the Secret
- Service, which is a federal agency. If that is the case, then there
- was an illegal search of people at the mall. There was no warrant and
- no indication of probable illegal activity. This raises constitutional
- issues. We have undertaken the filing of a Freedom of Information Act
- (FOIA) request to determine the scope, involvement and purpose of the
- Secret Service in this action."
-
- 2600 meetings are held on the evening of the first Friday of each
- month in public places and malls in New York City, Washington,
- Philadelphia, Cambridge, St. Louis, Chicago, Los Angeles and San
- Francisco. They are promoted by 2600 Magazine: The Hacker Quarterly
- and are attended by a variety of persons interested in
- telecommunications and so-called "hacker issues". The New York
- meeting, the oldest of its kind, is regularly attended by Eric Corley
- a/k/a Emmanuel Goldstein, editor and publisher of 2600, hackers,
- journalists, corporate communications professionals and other
- interested parties. It is known to have been the subject of
- surveillance at various times by law enforcement agencies conducting
- investigations into allegations of computer crime.
-
- Corley told Newsbytes "While I'm sure that meetings have been observed
- by law enforcement agencies, this is the only time that we have been
- harassed. It's definitely a freedom of speech issue." Corley also that
- he plans to be at the December meeting in Washington "to insure that
- it doesn't happen again."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- >Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 09:17:34
- >From: jmcmullen@well.sf.ca.us
- >Subject: File 6--Conflicting Stories In 2600 Raid; CRSR Files FOIA
-
- ((The following will appear on Newsbytes. Newsbytes is a copyrighted
- commercial service and its material may not be reproduced. This
- article is posted with the express permission of the authors.))
-
- WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A., 1992 NOV 11 (NB) -- In the on-going
- investigation of possible Secret Service involvement in the Friday,
- November 6th ejection of attendees at a "2600 meeting" from the
- premises of the Pentagon City Mall, diametrically opposed statements
- have come from the same source.
-
- Al Johnson, chief of security for the Pentagon City Mall told
- Newsbytes on Monday, November 9th "No one said that we were acting on
- behalf of the Secret Service. We were merely enforcing our
- regulations. While the group was not disruptive, it had pulled tables
- together and was having a meeting in our food court area. The food
- court is for people eating and is not for meetings. We therefore asked
- the people to leave."
-
- On the same day, Johnson was quoted was quoted in a Communications
- Daily article by Brock Meeks as saying "As far as I'm concerned, we're
- out of this. The Secret Service, the FBI, they're the ones that
- ramrodded this whole thing."
-
- Newsbytes contacted Meeks to discuss the discrepancies in the stories
- and were informed that the conversation with Johnson had been taped
- and was available for review. The Newsbytes reporter listened to the
- tape (and reviewed a transcript). On the tape, Johnson was clearly
- heard to make the statement quoted by Meeks.
-
- He also said "maybe you outta call the Secret Service, they're
- handling this whole thing. We, we were just here", and, in response
- to a Meeks question about a Secret Service contact, "Ah.. you know, I
- don't have a contact person. These people were working on their own,
- undercover, we never got any names, but they definitely, we saw
- identification, they were here."
-
- Newsbytes contacted Johnson again on the morning of Wednesday,
- November 11 and asked him once again whether there was any Secret
- Service involvement in the action. Johnson said "No, I told you that
- they were not involved." When it was mentioned that there was a story
- in Communications Daily, quoting him to the contrary, Johnson said "I
- never told Meeks that. There was no Secret Service involvement"
-
- Informed of the possible existence of a tape quoting him to the
- contrary. Johnson said "Meeks taped me? He can't do that. I'll show
- him that I'm not fooling around. I'll have him arrested."
-
- Johnson also said "He asked me if the Secret Service was involved; I
- just told him that, if he thought they were, he should call them and
- ask them."
-
- Then Johnson again told Newsbytes that the incident was "just a mall
- problem. There were too many people congregating."
-
- [NOTE: Newsbytes stands by its accurate reporting of Johnson's
- statements. It also affirms that the story by Meeks accurately
- reflects the material taped during his interview]
-
- In a related matter, Marc Rotenberg, director of the Washington office
- of Computer Professionals For Social Responsibility (CPSR) has
- announced that CPSR has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
- request with the Secret Service asking for information concerning
- Secret Service involvement in the incident.
-
- Rotenberg told Newsbytes that the Secret Service has 10 days to
- respond to the request. He also said that CPSR "is exploring other
- legal options in this matter."
-
- The Secret Service, in earlier conversations with Newsbytes, has
- denied that the mall security was working on its behalf.
-
- In the incident itself, a group attending the informal meeting was
- disbanded and, according to attendees, had property confiscated. They
- also contend that security guards took film from someone photographing
- the confiscation as well as a list that someone was making of the
- guard's names. In his November 9th conversation with Newsbytes,
- Johnson denied that security personnel took away any film or lists and
- further said "We did not confiscate any material. The group refused to
- own up to who owned material on the tables and in the vicinity so we
- collected it as lost material. If it turns out that anything did
- belong to any of those people, they are welcome to come in and, after
- making proper identification, take the material."
-
- 2600 meetings are promoted by 2600 Magazine: The Hacker Quarterly and
- are held on the evening of the first Friday of each month in public
- places and malls in New York City, Washington, Philadelphia,
- Cambridge, St. Louis, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco. They
- are regularly attended by a variety of persons interested in
- telecommunications and so-called "hacker issues".
-
- (Barbara E. McMullen & John F. McMullen/19921111)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- >Date: Wed 11 Nov 1992 19:34:56
- >From: Moderators<tk0jut2@mvs.cso.niu.edu>
- >Subject: File 7--Transcript from Al Johnson Interview
-
- ((MODERATORS' NOTE: Al Johnson, Director of Security for the Pentagon
- City Mall, has denied saying that the US Secret Service was involved
- in the 2600 disruption, and he has given other news sources a
- different version than he gave to Brock Meeks. The following are Al
- Johnson's original comments as transcribed from the original
- conversation. We leave it to readers to decide for themselves what Al
- Johnson said in the initial interview.))
-
- Further information may be obtained from Brock Meeks at:
- (202) 872-9202 ex. 271; or
- 2115 Ward Ct. NW, Washington, DC 20037
- +++++
-
- Transcript of interview with Mr. Al Johnson, Dir. Security for
- Pentagon City Mall
-
- B. Meeks: I'd like to ask you a few questions about an incident where
- some of your security guards broke up a meeting of some hackers
- on Friday (Nov. 6).
-
- Al Johnson: They broke up some meeting of hackers?
-
- B. Meeks: Yes.
-
- AJ: I don't know about breaking any meeting up. Who... first of
- all I can't talk to you on the phone, if you want to come in, I
- don't talk to the press on the phone.
-
- B. Meeks: OK
-
- AJ: Ahh... maybe you outta call the Secret Service, they're
- handling this whole thing. We, we were just here.
-
- B. Meeks: the Secret Service was part of this?
-
- AJ: Well, FBI, Secret Service, everybody was here, so you might
- want to call their office and talk to them. There's not much I
- can really tell you here.
-
- B. Meeks: OK
-
- AJ: Our involvement was minimum, you know, minimal.
-
- B. Meeks: I see, but your folks were acting on...
-
- AJ: We didn't break anything... I.. we didn't.. as far as I
- know, well I can't say much on the phone. But I, well,
- somebody's awfully paranoid apparently. Where'd you get this
- information from?
-
- B. Meeks: Umm.... from computer bulletin boards
-
- AJ: Bulletin Boards?
-
- B. Meeks: Yep.
-
- AJ: When did you get it?
-
- B. Meeks: I got it, ah, Sunday night.
-
- AJ: Sunday night?
-
- B. Meeks: Yep.
-
- AJ: [small laugh] Ah, yeah, you gotta call the FBI and the
- Secret Service there's not much I can do for you here.
-
- B. Meeks: Ok. Al, if I come down there will you talk to me to down
- there?
-
- AJ: No. I can't talk to you at all. Fact is, there's nothing
- to talk about. Our involvement in anything was minimal, I don't
- know where this information came from as far as bulletin boards,
- and breaking meetin's up and you know...
-
- B. Meeks: Well, the Arlington police were down there too. I mean I've
- talked to several of the kids that were involved.
-
- AJ: Um-hmmm
-
- B. Meeks: They said, that ah, members of your, of the mall security
- forces, ah, or security staff, searched them, confiscated some
- material and didn't give it back. Did any of this happen?
-
- AJ: Like I said, I'm not, I'm not able to talk to you... we have
- a policy that we don't talk to the press about anything like
- that. You can call the Secret Service, call the FBI, they're the
- ones that ramrodded this whole thing, and you talk to them, we're
- out of this basically, you know, as far as I'm concerned here.
-
- B. Meeks: Ok. Is there a contact person over there that you can...
-
- AJ: Ah.. you know, I don't have a contact person. These people
- were working on their own, undercover, we never got any names,
- but they definitely, we saw identification, they were here.
-
- B. Meeks: They were there. So it was all the Secret Service and none
- of your men?
-
- AJ: Ah, nah, that's not what I said. But they're the ones you
- want to talk to. There's nothing I can really ya. Okay?
-
- B. Meeks: Okay.
-
- AJ: Thanks.
-
- B. Meeks: Bye.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Computer Underground Digest #4.57
- ************************************
-