home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!caen!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!tzs
- From: tzs@carson.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith)
- Subject: Re: November LPF Programming Freedom issue
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.093653.6552@u.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of Washington School of Law, Class of '95
- References: <1992Nov15.182219.2730@news.cs.indiana.edu> <FRIEDMAN.92Nov15220042@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 09:36:53 GMT
- Lines: 10
-
- friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Noah Friedman) writes:
- > If the LPF urged a boycott on every company which had software patents
- >or interface copyrights, we would have far less support because it would
- >mean boycotting such a substantial fraction of the software industry.
-
- Not only would LPF lose support, LPF would need a new place to post
- from! MIT holds software patents, doesn't it? (More than Apple, I
- believe).
-
- --Tim Smith
-