home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!scslwide!wsgw!wsservra!daemon
- From: oj@miki.pictel.com (Oliver Jones)
- Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.x-window
- Subject: Re: X standard for CopyArea
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.084504.2612@sm.sony.co.jp>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 08:45:04 GMT
- Sender: daemon@sm.sony.co.jp (The devil himself)
- Distribution: fj
- Organization: PictureTel Corporation
- Lines: 15
- Approved: michael@sm.sony.co.jp
-
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:23:38 GMT
- Message-Id: <1992Nov11.142338.1560@miki.pictel.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
- References: <10NOV199210563988@alpha.sunquest.com>
- Sender: xpert-request@expo.lcs.mit.edu
-
- In article <10NOV199210563988@alpha.sunquest.com> djp@alpha.sunquest.com (Dan Parslow, ext. 2556) writes:
- >
- >If the source and destination of a call to CopyArea are on the
- >same drawable, and they overlap,... will
- >the copy be performed "safely" so that the destination rectangle,
- >after CopyArea returns, is exactly what the source rectangle was
- >before the copy?
-
- Yes.
-