home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.apollo
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!etl.go.jp!daemon
- From: sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!netnews@hplabs.hpl.hp.com (Peter E. Giza)
- Subject: RE: Need Some Advice...
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.070422.22047@etl.go.jp>
- Sender: apollo-request@srvr1.engin.umich.edu
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Chelmsford, MA
- Distribution: fj
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 21:00:05 GMT
- Return-Path: <apollo-list-errors@srvr1.engin.umich.edu>
- Approved: kato@etl.go.jp
- Lines: 16
-
- Herb Peyerl Writes:
- |>If you want to make the assumption that IP packets are encapsulated within
- |>DDS packets, then in order to make HP-UX reside on ATR, HP must then have
- |>ported DDS to HP-UX on 400's and 700's... That must mean 700's have
- |>node-ids. Somehow I doubt that.
-
-
- Just for the record. The ATR cards are same with the exception of
- few changes for the HP. The packets are encapsulated in a 73 byte
- DDS header just like good ole Domain, this is all done at the driver
- level for the card. All of the DDS-like behaviour is from the driver
- there is not a complete DDS port, just enough to make you pregnant.
-
- -peg
-
- Peter E. Giza HP DCE T&D ~:@)
-