home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / comp / windows / x / 19407 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-20  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky comp.windows.x:19407 comp.windows.x.apps:1540 ba.windows.x:138 alt.toolkits.xview:1088 comp.windows.x.motif:7626
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!drago
  3. From: drago@netcom.com (Mike Park)
  4. Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.windows.x.apps,ba.windows.x,alt.toolkits.xview,comp.windows.x.motif,comp.windows.x.openlook
  5. Subject: Any Interface Builders that don't use Motif or OpenLook?
  6. Keywords: IB interface motif openlook
  7. Message-ID: <1992Nov20.211439.850@netcom.com>
  8. Date: 20 Nov 92 21:14:39 GMT
  9. Followup-To: comp.windows.x
  10. Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)
  11. Lines: 12
  12.  
  13. Are there any Interface Builders for X which do not use Motif or Open Look?
  14. I would like to develop applications for systems that cannot afford
  15. the overhead, especially in terms of memory, that Motif and Open Look
  16. require.
  17.  
  18. References to commercial or public domain packages appreciated.  Thanks.
  19.  
  20. (Followup set to comp.windows.x)
  21.  
  22. Mike
  23. -- 
  24. Mike Park                                              drago@netcom.com
  25.