home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!rdg.dec.com!decvax.dec.com!pa.dec.com!datum.nyo.dec.com!croton.nyo.dec.com!frank
- From: frank@croton.nyo.dec.com (Frank Wortner)
- Subject: Re: psroff
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.145502.17730@datum.nyo.dec.com>
- Keywords: roff groff
- Lines: 12
- Sender: usenet@datum.nyo.dec.com (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: frank@nyo.dec.com
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- References: <NWR8JKV@math.fu-berlin.de> <4500@datum.nyo.dec.com> <1992Nov17.215055.26276@decuac.dec.com> <FV28LPP@math.fu-berlin.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:55:02 GMT
-
-
- In article <FV28LPP@math.fu-berlin.de>, beck@irzr17.inf.tu-dresden.de (Andre Beck) writes:
-
- |>Now I know, groff CAN be compiled on Ultrix. [...]
- |>Compile tbl without optimization.
- |>Otherwise, cc1plus WILL crash with a segment violation.
- |>At this point I remembered, gcc 2.2.2 is still BETA.
-
- I haven't tried this yet, but I believe that this problem has been fixed in
- GCC/G++ 2.3.1.
-
- Frank
-