home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.super
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!solman
- From: solman@athena.mit.edu (Jason W Solinsky)
- Subject: Re: What are people paying for when they by a supercomputer?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.073531.1601@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: m4-035-13.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <1992Nov15.201147.5302@athena.mit.edu> <1992Nov16.192316.22684@news.eng.convex.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 07:35:31 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- I am not going to bother trying to prove that $10K for 1 GFLOP peak is
- very do-able. If you don't believe me that's fine, but I think I have
- here the bits of information that I was looking for on why we don't see
- machines with this price performance.
-
- In article <1992Nov16.192316.22684@news.eng.convex.com>, Patrick F. McGehearty <patrick@convex.COM> writes:
-
- |> Going from parts cost to full product takes on the order of a factor of 5
- |> for low to moderate volume products.
-
- |> It is also worth noting that any system that is shipping today started its
- |> design 2 to 5 years ago. A design started today should produce a product
- |> which cost significantly less with a higher performance.
-
- While I am working on a related project of my own, I originally asked the
- question after noting the HUGE price difference between the low-end and
- high-end AXP machines, and the comparatively low performance gain. Clearly
- people are getting something for that extra money and its not superior
- performance. I wanted to see what people who may have been involved in the
- purchase of a supercomputer think they got for their money.
-
- Jason W. Solinsky
-