home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!bradley.bradley.edu!pwh
- From: pwh@bradley.bradley.edu (Pete Hartman)
- Subject: Re: avoiding Solaris
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.161102.709@bradley.bradley.edu>
- Organization: Bradley University
- References: <15474@auspex-gw.auspex.com> <morgaine.721992103@siap.sublink.org> <15540@auspex-gw.auspex.com> <BxwsK4.6Ko@VOA.GOV>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 16:11:02 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In <BxwsK4.6Ko@VOA.GOV> ck@VOA.GOV (Chris Kern) writes:
- >Seems to me there are three significant (but one-time) costs to Sun's
- >customers in the migration from SunOS 4.1.X to Solaris 2.
-
- Who says Sun isn't going to change something else fundamental on us
- in another couple of years, just like they dumped the Sun 3 users
- flat?
- --
- Pete Hartman Bradley University pwh@bradley.bradley.edu
- We are obviously very close to reproducing the Muslim paradise
- where every orgasm lasts six hundred years
-