home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
- Path: sparky!uunet!ukma!wupost!crcnis1.unl.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!usenet-feed.cc.umr.edu!mcs213i.cs.umr.edu!rfranken
- From: rfranken@mcs213i.cs.umr.edu (Richard Brett Frankenberger)
- Subject: Re: Downing the server
- References: <BxKvLH.LwE@acsu.buffalo.edu> <92321.094304IBUJAM@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:27:02 GMT
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mcs213i.cs.umr.edu
- Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla
- Sender: cnews@umr.edu (UMR Usenet News Post)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.232702.7090@umr.edu>
- Lines: 21
-
- I'm surprised no one has brought up the performance issue ... a 3.11 server
- automatically tunes itself as it runs. If you down it every weekend, then
- every Monday, you will have a period of less-than-optimum tuning while the
- server re-tunes itself from the default values.
-
- If you elect to down the server nightly or weekly, then I suggest that you find
- out what some of the optimum settings for the various parameters are and
- SET then in your AUTOEXEC.NCF so the server will not have to re-tune
- itself everytime it comes up (personally, I run each server for about a
- month or so and then see where most of the parameters end up, and then do some
- calculations on my own, and set the parameters to the values I find to be
- optimum initially, and then set the limits of those parameters to the values
- I determined to be optimum, so the server can't increase them due to a burst
- in traffic).
-
- My personaly opinion about downing the server is never do it (except when needed
- to install additional hardware, etc., of course), but there are definitely two
- sides to this issue, and neither side is probably "correct."
-
- - Brett
-
-