home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!gateway
- From: FELSON_ADJ@CCSUA.CTSTATEU.EDU
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
- Subject: Re: How goodis SPICE48?
- Date: 20 Nov 1992 10:04:05 -0600
- Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
- Lines: 21
- Sender: daemon@cs.utexas.edu
- Message-ID: <921120104102.2382bd45@CCSUA.CTSTATEU.EDU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu
-
- ! akcs.mahler@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com writes:
- !
- ! I bought SPICE48 too, and sadly, I have to agree with Mr McGuire. This
- ! spice models only linear circuits, which can be a major limitation. The
- ! userinterface looks good and is fairly easy to use. Drawing all but the
- ! simplist of circuits, though, takes quite a while. Drawing = inputting.
- ! I was tollerably satisfied with this card until today when I decided to
- ! take a peek at the code. From what I saw, its all USER_-RPL!! I did
- ! find an occasional SYSEVAL, but I am still dissapointed. For $115, I
- ! want system RPL. user RPL is just too slow and bulky for an application
- ! like spice. I'm sure a system RPL version would be much quicker,
- ! smaller, and alltogether better. For a commercial product such as this,
- ! I feel that writing the bulk of it in user RPL is just plain lazy. (Keep
- ! in mind that by no means did I look through the whole 110K, so I could be
- ! exaggerating) Oh well, maybe next version...
- ! Jason Grant
- !
- !
-
- I see listed in EduCalc # 57 another circuit simulator called VERBB.
- Anybody tried it? Is it any faster/better/whatever that SPICE48?
-