home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Path: sparky!uunet!ornl!rsg1.er.usgs.gov!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!aw2t+
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Message-ID: <If3EtE600VovEcJQkh@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 11:12:00 -0500
- From: "Alex R.N. Wetmore" <aw2t+@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Subject: Re: FinalCopyII opinions ?
- In-Reply-To: <jim.722172270@marsh>
- Lines: 29
-
- Excerpts from netnews.comp.sys.amiga.applications: 19-Nov-92 FinalCopyII
- opinions ? by Jim McGrady@cs.curtin.ed
- > Several posters are now using FCII. I'd like to know how it compares
- > with FCI in terms of
-
- I haven't used FCI, but here are my opinions of FCII after playing with
- it for a while.
-
- > - graphics print speed and quality
-
- The graphics printing was very good on my 9 pin printer (looked as good
- as one can expect from a 9-pin at least, and riveled what I have seen as
- output by most apps on a 24-pin).
-
- > - font rendering quality
-
- The fonts look very good on paper, and are readable on a 640x400 screen
- (interlaced), but are unreadable in any size less then 18-points on a
- 640x200 screen. I haven't figured out a way to use bitmap fonts instead
- (which would be nice on my 1000).
-
- > - general feel and speed of operation
-
- It seems very slow on my a1000. If there was a way to use bitmap fonts
- instead life would be much better.
-
- alex
-
-
-