home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.applications:8759 comp.sys.amiga.introduction:1558 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:29361
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!axion!gssec.bt.co.uk!squigg
- From: squigg@gssec.bt.co.uk (Stephen Quigg)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.introduction,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
- Subject: Re: Programming
- Keywords: AMOS, beginners, programming
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.125329.4643@gssec.bt.co.uk>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 12:53:29 GMT
- References: <1e4l57INNndp@ub.d.umn.edu> <mwm.2ndl@contessa.palo-alto.ca.us> <1e5rq2INNa7e@ub.d.umn.edu> <Bxs1D7.A3o@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>
- Sender: usenet@gssec.bt.co.uk
- Organization: BT Glasgow Systems and Software Engineering Centre, Scotland.
- Lines: 20
-
-
- --
- Stephen J Johnston writes ::
-
- > I disagree ..... modules should comply with the rules of other modules etc ...
-
- where did you go to college ?
- The whole point of a module is that it is entirely independant from all other
- modules in the completed code , meaning that any module can be changed as much
- as you like ,as long as it's interface to the other modules is seen to be the
- same (ie same data passed between them ....)
- Correct me if I picked up what you were saying wrongly ....
-
- Anyway , forget modules , object orientation is by far the superior solution ,
- both for small-scale AND large projects !
-
- Stephen Quigg
- squigg@gssec.bt.co.uk
- British Telecom , GSSEC , Glasgow
- (Nothing in any of my mail represents my Employer in any way)
-