home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!lbl.gov!vxwexplo
- From: wdf%ukfca1@sj.ate.slb.com
- Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
- Subject: re: Ethernets and backplane networks
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 09:32:27 GMT
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
- Lines: 33
- Sender: vxwexplo@lbl.gov
- Message-ID: <9211170932.AA24316@pickle.uk.ate.slb.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
- Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov
-
- Mike Anderson replied to my questions about using up internet network
- numbers (with 'private' ethernets for VxXorks crates and backplane
- networks) with a fairly comprehensive posting about subnets. I have
- a further question on that subject: do the subnets have to be physically
- connected ? Ie. could the subnets be arranged as follows where the
- subnets have netmask 0xffffffc0:
-
- Internet G/W Main Ethernet (not subnetted)
- Internet ----------[192.9.200.1]----------------------------------------------
- (sees only | |
- net 192.9.200.0) | |
- --------------- ---------------
- Suns w/ 2 Enets [ 192.9.200.2 ] [ 192.9.200.3 ] <- main Enet
- [ 192.9.201.1 ] [ 192.9.201.64] <- subnetted Enet
- --------------- ---------------
- | |
- | |
- (00 sub-network) --------- |
- ---------- (01 sub-network)
-
- I would guess that the problem may be that each Sun could only have one
- netmask, and for the above configuration it would need a different one for
- the main network (192.9.200) and the sub-netted network (192.9.201).
-
- Bill
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bill Frewing
- Schlumberger Technologies Phone: +44 (202) 893535
- Ferndown Industrial Estate Fax: +44 (202) 897097
- Wimborne, Dorset, BH21 7PP Email: wdf@ukfca1.uk.ate.slb.com
- United Kingdom
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-