home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!dutrun!donau!dutecaj.et.tudelft.nl!linstee
- From: linstee@dutecaj.et.tudelft.nl (Erik van Linstee)
- Subject: Summary on less TRAP E wanted.
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.184819.16850@donau.et.tudelft.nl>
- Sender: news@donau.et.tudelft.nl (UseNet News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: dutecaj.et.tudelft.nl
- Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:48:19 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- Can someone summarise what caused less to give a trap E?
- I was at a friends the other day and gave him the less
- that had been working on my system without any problems.
- It gives a trap E. Difference between our machines is
- that mine is a 486-33 with 17M memory and his is a 386-33
- with 8M memory and a ULSI 387. My simms are 9 chip, his
- are 3 chip. (All of them, and same speed)
- Now there is a small change I recompile less with -m486
- using gcc/emx, I'm not sure.
- It *was* compiled using gcc/emx using the link386 linker
- (-Zomf -Zmt).
-
- Thanks
- Erik
-
- --
- Erik van Linstee | Delft University of Technology | I'll be back ...
- ----
- We are god, 'cause only we can create the idea of his existence
- in our holy brains... (Yello)
-