home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:8498 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:2688
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!kubds1!hoppie
- From: hoppie@kub.nl (Jeroen Hoppenbrouwers)
- Subject: Re: Windoze point-n-drool interface. (Workers hate windoze, revolution at 11! :-)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.091954.2122@kub.nl>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 09:19:54 GMT
- Organization: Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Nntp-Posting-Host: kubix
- References: <GERRY.92Nov13123205@onion.cmu.edu> <1992Nov15.192552.626@grebyn.com> <1992Nov16.085509.26648@umr.edu>
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Nov16.085509.26648@umr.edu> ckincy@mcs213f.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy) writes:
- >And at least the OS/2 interface attempts to appeal to the intellect.
- >And, studies prove that OS/2 users go through fewer mice than Windows
- >users. Drool and mice do not mix well. Drool tends to corrode the
- >contacts.
- >
- >cpk
-
- Aha... finally some scientific proof that OS/2 is better than Windogs?
- I would like to see these studies! I've got a whole (well...) university
- to convert here. Everyone uses Windogs to multitask WordPerfect and
- Lotus 1-2-3... but I need scientific material to convince them...
-
- Jeroen
-
- --
- Jeroen Hoppenbrouwers, research engineer at | Stop connecting computers;
- Infolab, Tilburg University, The Netherlands | start connecting people!
-