home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!pv34c1.vincent.iastate.edu!moore
- From: moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore)
- Subject: Re: MS ACCESS vs PARADOX/Win
- Message-ID: <moore.722206464@pv34c1.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
- References: <1992Nov13.192808.12128@PacBell.COM> <168A180F1.JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu> <8693@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:54:24 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In <8693@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU> weiss@mott.seas.ucla.edu (Michael Weiss) writes:
-
- >In article <168A180F1.JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu> JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu writes:
- >>And how does Access relate to FoxPro for Windows, which I had assumed was
- >>going to be MS's database for Windows?
-
- >I asked Microsoft this very question. They told me that Access is easier to
- >use, but less powerful. They would not go into further detail than that. It
- >kinda pisses me off.
-
- I'm not real familiar with FoxPro, but I really don't see anything that
- Access won't do at this point, that another DataBase program would.
-
- Access needs a runtime engine and more file type support, but it covers
- the major ones, and other will probably be out soon.
-
- --
- ________________________________________________________________________
- / / /
- / Brian J. Moore / moore@iastate.edu /
- /__________________________________/____________________________________/
-