home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!rpi!sarah!uacsc2.albany.edu!JC924
- From: JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
- Subject: Re: MS ACCESS vs PARADOX/Win
- Message-ID: <168A1DF04.JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 20:51:30 GMT
- Article-I.D.: uacsc2.168A1DF04.JC924
- References: <1992Nov13.192808.12128@PacBell.COM> <168A180F1.JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu> <1992Nov16.165628.8451@PacBell.COM> <1992Nov16.183820.14695@eng.umd.edu>
- Sender: news@sarah.albany.edu (News Administrator)
- Organization: University at Albany, Albany NY 12222
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Nov16.183820.14695@eng.umd.edu>
- senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Nov16.165628.8451@PacBell.COM> jcwasik@srv.PacBell.COM (Joe Wasik) writes:
- >>>And how does Access relate to FoxPro for Windows, which I had assumed was
- >>>going to be MS's database for Windows?
- >>
- >>These are two separate products. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the
- >>Access product has been known for years as "Project Cairo." MS already had
- >>it when they bought out FoxPro. I do not know what their plans are. One
- >>would hope they would migrate these two products together.
- >>
- So, what are the differences between Access and FoxPro? Is Access a more
- limited product? FoxPro is certainly a top-of-the-line database system.
-
-