home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.ms-windows.apps:5180 comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc:6465
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.apps,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!atropa!berger
- From: berger@atropa (Mike Berger)
- Subject: Re: TCP/IP and Windows for Workgroups
- References: <1992Nov17.162001.14830@devildog.att.com> <BxxJ1G.4vv@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <7nnq0_k@lynx.unm.edu>
- Message-ID: <By35C2.D8K@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner)
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 21:36:01 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- (Tim Keitt) writes:
- >using QVT/NET. The question is WHAT GOOD IS WfWG OUT OF THE BOX
- >WITHOUT BUYING ANY OTHER SOFTWARE FOR TCP/IP CONNECTIONS? Does
- >it include TCP/IP utilities a la QVT/NET? Can I mount remote
- >drives? Transparently print to remote printers? Or am I better
- *----
- According to the ads I've received, that's exactly what it's good
- for: You can remote mount directories and use printers remotely.
- There doesn't appear to be much, if any, security.
- --
- Mike Berger
- Internet berger@atropa.stat.uiuc.edu
-