home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
- Path: sparky!kent
- From: kent@sparky.imd.sterling.com (Kent Landfield)
- Subject: Re: Is there interest in comp.sources.postscript?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.053846.14232@sparky.imd.sterling.com>
- Organization: Sterling Software
- References: <1992Nov14.034205.7362@gvl.unisys.com> <1992Nov14.235834.9723@dsd.es.com> <6803@m1.cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 05:38:46 GMT
- Lines: 27
- X-Md4-Signature: 8c6b2ac5e1733098229b51819791f775
-
- In article <6803@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> lilleyc@cs.man.ac.uk (Chris Lilley) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov14.235834.9723@dsd.es.com> rthomson@dsd.es.com
- >(Rich Thomson) writes:
- >>This is one of the many reasons for moderating a sources group. The
- >>moderator would simply weed out any comments and not approve them.
- >
- >You mean, just discard them? Why? Are you trying to stop any of the
- >discussion that would occur when sources were posted?
- >
- >Or are you suggesting that the moderator(s) should redirect discussion
- >to the comp.lang.postscript?
-
- It is real simple to put a Followup-To: header into the posted sources
- which redirects the discussion to the right place. I add a
- Followup-To: comp.sources.d
- to posting which go to comp.sources.misc. That way the discussion goes on
- where it should and I need to deal with much less mail... :-) In the case
- of comp.sources.postscript the followups could be redirected to c.l.postscript.
- Also, I politely inform people who have misdirected discussion posts to c.s.misc
- so that they know they need to repost them to the right group.
-
- -Kent+
- ---
- Kent Landfield INTERNET: kent@IMD.Sterling.COM
- Sterling Software, IMD UUCP: uunet!sparky!kent
- Phone: (402) 291-8300 FAX: (402) 291-4362
- Please send comp.sources.misc-related mail to kent@uunet.uu.net.
-