home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.gopher
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!mizar.cc.umanitoba.ca!rahardj
- From: rahardj@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo)
- Subject: perl gopher (was Re: More bugs gopher1.1b1 )
- Message-ID: <Bxy8KA.HCt@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
- Sender: news@ccu.umanitoba.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: antares.cc.umanitoba.ca
- Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- References: <mtm.722068331@CAMIS> <1edt7rINN1sl@nigel.msen.com> <1992Nov18.225223.28031@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 05:57:45 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- schemers@Slapshot.Stanford.EDU (Roland Schemers) writes:
-
- >In article <1edt7rINN1sl@nigel.msen.com>, emv@msen.com (Edward Vielmetti) |>
- >|> I have a hunch that a competent perl programmer could put together a
- >|> bare bones totally new server in a fairly short amount of time, either
- >|> of the traditional "it's a file system" model plopped down on a bunch of
- >|> directories or some kind of "it's a database" model stuck in in front
- >|> of dbm or oracle or sybase databases. The protocol per se is just not
- >|> that complicated.
- >|>
-
- >Actually I was going to do this. After thinking about the go4gw stuff, it
- >seemed that a perl gopher would be much easier to write, maintain, modify,
- >etc, in perl.
-
- Yes, yes, yes, please.
-
- ...
- >Sounds like a project for this weekend... :-O
-
-
-
- >Roland
-
- -- budi
- --
- Budi Rahardjo <Budi_Rahardjo@UManitoba.Ca>
- Unix Support - Computer Services - University of Manitoba
-