home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!irishvma!nlaflamm
- Date: Monday, 16 Nov 1992 10:28:21 EST
- From: Nick Laflamme <NLAFLAMM@vma.cc.nd.edu>
- Message-ID: <92321.102821NLAFLAMM@vma.cc.nd.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.gopher
- Subject: Re: More people would use gopher if ...
- References: <BxMJLI.n0B@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Lines: 31
-
- For what it's worth, the problem with "gopher" may be simply that it's
- too cute and meaningless.
-
- It's OK to call a sports car "Mustang" if you have a huge publicity
- campaign so that everyone equates "Mustang" with "sports car." Or, at
- the very least, someone who wants a sports car is likely to go to a
- dealer when it's open and say, "Show me your sports cars."
-
- But names like Archie and Gopher are to our casual users obscure and
- meaningless. They don't care where their information retrieval tool
- comes from. (And who the heck is Archie, anyway, and why is my FTP site
- navigator named after him?) They'd like a word processor to have the
- word "Word" in the title somewhere so they can be fairly sure what it
- is, and an information access system might as well have the word "Info"
- or something else blindingly obvious in it. When our users work after
- our help desks are closed (or are staffed with minimally helpful
- consultants), they don't want menus listing seventeen euphenisms or cute
- names. They want clear, meaningful names pointing the way to the
- answers they need.
-
- Most of the world are not computer nerds. Most of us are. Remember
- the difference.
-
- One computer nerd's opinion, of course. :-)
-
- Nick
-
- ps - Besides, like the posting said, gophers are solitary, anti-social
- creatures. They'd be the targets and instigators of continual flame
- wars if they were really on the Net. Is that a good image for a tool
- for sharing all kinds of information selflessly? :-)
-