home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!telecom-request
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 21:21:45 CST
- From: mearle@pro-party.cts.com (Mark Earle)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
- Subject: Re: New Area Code Blitzes Cell Phone User
- Message-ID: <telecom12.869.6@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Organization: TELECOM Digest
- Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 869, Message 6 of 8
- Lines: 19
-
- No, I'm saying, despite it being permissive, the SA cellular providers
- made a deadline, and told everyone to get their phones re-programmed.
-
- Then, aparently, the GTE mobilnet switches in Houston were not updated
- in a timely manner -- we later found out the ESN of my of my friends
- phone was declared "bad" because it no longer matched the data base
- entry.
-
- Regular land line type non-cmt phone companies are, thankfully, doing
- better than GTE Mobilenet.
-
-
- mwe
- mearle@pro-party.cts.com (Mark Earle) [WA2MCT/5]
- FidoNet at Opus 1:160/50.0
- Bitnet adblu001@ccsu.vm1
- Internet 73117.351@compuserve.com
-
-