home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!telecom-request
- From: monty@proponent.com (Monty Solomon)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
- Subject: Cellular Misinformation
- Message-ID: <telecom12.850.11@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 00:11:42 GMT
- Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Organization: TELECOM Digest
- Lines: 40
- Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 850, Message 11 of 13
-
- Excerpt from RISKS DIGEST 14.03
-
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 14:58:48 EST
- From: "Barry C. Nelson" <bnelson@ccb.bbn.com>
- Subject: Cellular Misinformation
-
- The {Boston Globe}, 9 Nov 1992, had a human interest story
- illustrating some good uses for the ubiquitous cellular phones. In
- many places you can dial *SP for the State Police, and this had been
- credited with getting rapid assistance to accident and crime victims,
- as well as apprehending a dangerous escapee. They mentioned problems
- with routing 911 calls.
-
- What I found more interesting was a discussion about the Coast Guard
- preparing to adopt *CG as a maritime cellular distress number. A
- local official was quoted as saying that the existing broadcast
- channels will remain in operation because anyone nearby will hear you
- and the CG operates Direction Finding stations to pinpoint your
- location. Okay ...
-
- But then he went on to say that cellular calls "only give you a point
- to point channel", leading one to the wrong belief that they couldn't
- DF a cellular user, and that nobody else could listen if they wanted
- to.
-
-
- BC Nelson
-
- P.S.: After a PGN talk at MIT recently, someone in the audience
- claimed that the FBI has multiple "trunks" attached to the local
- cellular hub in Boston and they can monitor both sides of a
- conversation by just typing in your number. Thank goodness that this
- is a democracy. :-^
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: If Mr. Nelson got the impression the author was
- saying 'no one can listen to you because cellular is point to point'
- then that is his misunderstanding. I wouldn't have come to that
- conclusion based on the author's statement. Would you, readers? PAT]
-