home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!ub!niktow!pavlov
- From: pavlov@niktow.canisius.edu (Greg Pavlov)
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Subject: Re: DEC Alpha AXP System INTEGER Performance
- Keywords: Alpha, AXP, SPEC, DEC, INTEGER
- Message-ID: <1710@niktow.canisius.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 18:53:27 GMT
- References: <1992Nov10.153629.27510@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <martin.721554717@bert> <jdd.721687838@cdf.toronto.edu>
- Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <jdd.721687838@cdf.toronto.edu>, jdd@cdf.toronto.edu (John DiMarco) writes:
- > In <1698@niktow.canisius.edu> pavlov@niktow.canisius.edu (Greg Pavlov) writes:
- >
- > > The SPECint92 values seem somewhat low, in terms of processor MHz. Any
- > > known reasons why ? Essentially, our R3000-based systems, at 40 MHz,
- > > have a SPECint92 (measured by DEC) that is apx. 40% of an ALPHA-based
- > > system at 133 MHz.
- >
- > There are two ways of making processors fast. One is making them do more
- > per clock cycle. The other is making them run at a higher clock rate.
- >
- Of course. But you are summarizing my question, not answering it.
-
-
- pavlov@fstrf.org
-