home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!scott.skidmore.edu!psinntp!psinntp!scylla!daryl
- From: daryl@oracorp.com (Daryl McCullough)
- Subject: Re: The Paradox of the Unexpected Hanging
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.124635.11533@oracorp.com>
- Organization: ORA Corporation
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:46:35 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <B147TB4w165w@CODEWKS.nacjack.gen.nz>,
- system@CODEWKS.nacjack.gen.nz (Wayne McDougall) writes:
-
- >>>> The statement "You will be executed today, but you will not be able to
- >>>> figure out that you will be executed today" is *not*
- >>>> self-contradictory...
-
- >Ok, so the judge's statement is NOT self-contradictory if you assume
- >the truth-value of the statement is unknown.
-
- It isn't self-contradictory, in any case. It may be false, however.
-
- >So we're saying it is either meaningless, or we don't know if it is true.
- >We are also saying that we, as the prisoner, cannot believe ALL of the
- >statement to be true. So the prisoner can conclude that either all or
- >part of the statement is false.
-
- No! Just because I cannot consistently *believe* that something is
- true, does not mean that I must believe that it is false. For example,
- PA cannot consistently prove the statement "PA is consistent" (coded
- as an arithmetic statement), but that doesn't mean that the statement
- is false, or that PA can prove that it is false.
-
- The prisoner can neither consistently believe the judge, nor
- consistently believe the judge is lying. That's why it is important to
- partition sentences into those that you believe true, those you believe
- false, and those whose truth values you can't determine (and may *never*
- be able to determine).
-
- Daryl McCullough
- ORA Corp.
- Ithaca, NY
-
-