home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!utcsri!robinson
- Newsgroups: can.politics
- From: robinson@mdivax1.uucp (Jim Robinson)
- Subject: Re: Reform Party
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.051305.4747@mdivax1.uucp>
- Reply-To: robinson@mdd.comm.mot.com (Jim Robinson)
- Organization: Motorola - Mobile Data Division; Richmond, BC
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
- References: <1992Nov23.005655.8997@ee.ubc.ca>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 05:13:38 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- John Paul Morrison (jmorriso@ee.ubc.ca) wrote:
- >In article <aidler.722412657@sanjuan> aidler@sanjuan.UVic.CA (E Alan Idler) writes:
-
- [a number of RP poilicy positions deleted]
-
- >These are excellent principles.
-
- I like a great deal of them as well. That is why I take an interest in the
- goings-on of the RP.
-
- >So why does it feel so icky to support the Reform Party?
- >
- >I want much clearer evidence that the Reform Party is not dragging in
- >a lot of relgious, moralistic, sel-righteous dogma in with its policies.
- >
- >I am not totally convinced that the Reform Party stands for seperating
- >religious and moral issues from the economic and democratic issues.
-
- Perhaps we could put the shoe on the other foot, and you could tell us why
- you think the RP may be guilty of the above? After all, your statements are
- somewhat akin to asking a person if they have stopped beating their spouse
- yet.
- --
- Jim Robinson
- robinson@mdd.comm.mot.com
- {ubc-cs!van-bc,uunet}!mdivax1!robinson
-
-