In the 14 years from 1978, when the law took force, to 1991, the
statistical review says that 388 cases ver went to court - and 123 language
offenders were conviced, an average of less than NINE A YEAR. That didn't
make a headline either.
"
That's 14 too many, for my tastes. The fact that the number of people wronged by bill 101 is small, does not form a justification for that law's existence.
On the topic of the statistics presented in the article, I was never aware nor
have I cared what the pay ratio between bilingual anglophones and bilingual
francophones was, and I still don't. What was the point of all that, anyway?
