home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!WESLEYAN.BITNET!SGRUCAN
- X-Envelope-to: notis-l@tcsvm.BITNET
- Message-ID: <01GR85F2HK6O8Y5Z1G@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:27:37 LCL
- Sender: NOTIS discussion group list <NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET>
- From: Sally Grucan <SGRUCAN@WESLEYAN.BITNET>
- Subject: 6xx/7xx Non-indexing
- Lines: 15
-
- Betsy Hines is correct. I learned from our Systems Librarian that NOTIS
- *batch* reindexing does, indeed, refuse to recognize subsequent 6xx/7xx fields
- when there is an error in a prior 6xx. Furthermore, records with alternate
- graphic representation (involving the 880 field) won't index at all. We
- are now using the LB310 NOTIS Bibliographic Index Generation report to correct
- these fields.
-
-
-
- Sally Grucan BITNET: sgrucan@wesleyan
- Systems Planning and INTERNET: sgrucan@eagle.wesleyan.edu
- Head Catalog Librarian Phone: (203) 347-9411 ext. 3007
- Olin Library Fax: (203) 344-7969
- Wesleyan University
- Middletown CT O6459-0108
-