home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / bit / listserv / ibmmain / 2675 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-20  |  1.1 KB  |  24 lines
  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!COMPCTR.CCS.CSUS.EDU!RYERSONRA
  3. X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.1c R5.
  4. X-Pmrqc:  1
  5. Message-ID: <MAILQUEUE-99.921120095327.448@compctr.ccs.csus.edu>
  6. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
  7. Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 09:53:25 PST
  8. Sender:       IBM Mainframe Discussion list <IBM-MAIN@RICEVM1.BITNET>
  9. From:         Rob Ryerson <RYERSONRA@COMPCTR.CCS.CSUS.EDU>
  10. Subject:      DFHSM Recalls & Batch
  11. Lines: 11
  12.  
  13. Reviewed your problem statement, and ran a few quick tests here. We
  14. do not do tape migration, only disk, so senario is not exact. I did
  15. not have your same symptoms. A two step batch job BR14
  16. (MOD,DELETE,DELETE) against a migrated dataset, followed by a BR14
  17. allocate (NEW,CATLG) consistantly had RC=0, and left the new dataset
  18. where and as expected. I don't know why tape migration might be
  19. different, and I can't set up to test that environment. If you'd like
  20. to compare set-up parms, reply directly.
  21.  
  22. Rob Ryerson CSUS
  23. <RYERSONRA@COMPCTR.CCS.CSUS.EDU>
  24.