home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!biosci!daresbury!news
- From: ajt@rri.sari.ac.uk (Tony Travis)
- Newsgroups: bionet.plants
- Subject: Re: super-optimal stomatal conductance
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.002254.17932@gserv1.dl.ac.uk>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 00:22:50 GMT
- Sender: list-admin@daresbury.ac.uk
- Reply-To: ajt@rri.sari.ac.uk
- Distribution: bionet
- Organization: Rowett Research Institute
- Lines: 43
- Original-To: plantbio@uk.ac.daresbury
-
- In article <921116185833.MIN-LXADa00255.bionet-news@uk.ac.daresbury> you wrote:
- : [...]
- : You're suggesting, perhaps, that 'self stressing' may be a means of drought
- : hardening?
-
- Yes, but I was speculating about the selective advantage that losing
- more water than was necessary for CO2 uptake may have. A high rate of
- transpiration does not, of course, imply water stress unless the supply
- of water to the leaf is restricted.
-
- I did some work (unpublished) in the early 80's where I grew plants at
- high humidity then measured the sensitivity of stomata on isolated
- epidermal strips. Interestingly, the stomata on high humidity plants
- opened wider, and appeared to be more sensitive to light and CO2.
-
- There was speculation at the time that endogenous IAA levels were
- higher in plants grown without water stress. The role of IAA in
- stomatal movements is not precisely understood, but the work of Marre
- (1979) with the fungal toxin fusicoccin suggests that IAA may be
- involved in the regulation of membrane bound ATPases involved in active
- ion transport into guard cell vacuoles during stomatal movements.
-
- : Its been suggested that low leaf water content or potential does not always
- : indicate a 'stress', but may simply reflect high photosynthetic rate (via
- : open stomata). The argument is that stomata would close if the leaf were
- : stressed.
-
- Well, water only moves if a lower water potential exists in the leaf so
- some degree of water stress is required as a basic component of the
- solute transport mechanism.
-
- However, as I said in a previous message there is evidence that a
- feedback mechanism alone is not sufficient to explain the behaviour of
- stomata (Cowan and Farquar, 1980). Their evidence suggests that
- stomata close _before_ the leaf becomes stressed (ie. feed-forward
- control).
-
- Tony.
- --
- Dr. A.J.Travis, | Tony Travis
- Rowett Research Institute, | JANET: <ajt@uk.ac.sari.rri>
- Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, | other: <ajt@rri.sari.ac.uk>
- Aberdeen, AB2 9SB. UK. | phone: 0224-712751
-