home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!seas.smu.edu!utacfd.uta.edu!news.uta.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!awdprime.austin.ibm.com!vpdbox.austin.ibm.com!dewey
- From: dewey@vpdbox.austin.ibm.com (Dewey Coffman)
- Newsgroups: austin.politics
- Subject: Re: We need Term Limits
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.152957.15643@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 15:29:57 GMT
- References: <1992Nov10.143317.11470@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> <1992Nov10.152247.12411@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> <1992Nov10.155931.13311@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>
- Sender: news@awdprime.austin.ibm.com (USENET News)
- Reply-To: dewey@vpdbox.austin.ibm.com
- Distribution: austin
- Organization: IBM, Austin, TX. US of A.
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Nov10.155931.13311@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>, curt@ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com (Curt Finch 903 2F021 curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com 512-838-2806) writes:
- |>
- |> > Con: The decision should be left to the people
- |>
- |> for the president too then?
-
- I thought the main reason for the Term Limit on the President
- was because it was such a BIG job, that most men age about 10
- years per term, that and the idea that they lose effectiveness
- after two terms due to being too close the problems they deal
- with daily.
-
- -dewey
-