home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1992-11-17 | 51.4 KB | 1,221 lines |
- Newsgroups: austin.eff
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.oc.com!utacfd.uta.edu!news.uta.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tic.com!riddle
- From: petrilli@nextover.pe.utexas.edu (Chris Petrilli)
- Subject: Connect*Austin Proposal (long, ASCII)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.235106.21817@tic.com>
- Originator: riddle@aahsa.tic.com
- Keywords: austin internet network connect public freenet
- Sender: news@tic.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aahsa.tic.com
- Reply-To: petrilli@nextover.pe.utexas.edu
- X-Submissions: eff-austin@tic.com
- Organization: none
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:18:49 GMT
- Approved: riddle@tic.com (Moderator, Prentiss Riddle)
- Lines: 1204
-
- I appologies for the empty posting, a slip of the keyboard, no more I promise
- :-) Below you will find an ASCII version of the proposal. There is some
- things missing, and this version will not be kept up to date as well (unless
- someone has a good Postscript -> ASCII converter), as it required nearly 30
- minutes of formatting to make appropriate for presentation from the pure
- ASCII text version that FrameMaker generated.
-
- This is a copy of the proposal that Bob Izenberg and myself were discussing
- at the Saturday (14th) meeting of the EFF-Austin group.
-
- Chris
-
- --- CUT HERE ---
- Connect*Austin
-
- Chris Petrilli
- Bob Izenberg
-
-
- A proposal for connecting
- the Austin area for the future.
-
- Connect*Austin is the name for a proposed solution to the growing
- problems in Austin that are related to the lack of connectivity within
- the city, while also addressing the greater problem of the changing
- face of technology in the world and in the process bringing about the
- realization of the information society. While many people have their
- own personal projects that fit a certain niche of the population
- within Austin, it is felt that the City is better served by a system
- that tries to encompass both the technological wizards within
- the town and also the computer-phobes who do not want to have
- anything to do with computers more than they absolutely have to.
- Connect*Austin is such a solution.
-
- This report presents a proposed three stage solution to the problem of
- connecting Austin and taking the City itself into the next century
- with the infrastructure that will be necessary to maintain
- competitiveness with the rest of the connected world. In
- addition, it tries to introduce the reader to the history behind this
- project, in addition to the ideology that it is based on.
-
- 1.0 The Project Name
-
- The name for the project is in fact a play on computer terminology,
- where an asterisk (`*') is generally used to refer to all of,
- all that relates to, or something else along a similar vein.
- Taken in that context, the project name, Connect*Austin, can be taken
- to mean Connect all of Austin, which is in fact the goal of
- the project.
-
- While the name of a project is, in general, not a very important facet
- of the whole package, it should reflect the overall goal of the
- project. The name Connect*Austin does just that, as the goal of the
- project is to connect the entire city (and surrounding areas) in a
- unified manner.
-
- 2.0 Goals
-
- The goals of this project are both varied and many, but can be broken
- down into a select few. Within these goals are the direction that this
- project intends to take if at all possible.
-
- While not all goals will be reached initially, all should be given
- equal effort and should eventually be realized. There will be many
- steps to be taken before the full project can be realized and it will
- require the efforts of a large number of people as well as the sup-
- port of the people in the city itself.
-
- Support for a project of this nature comes from the highest levels of
- the government and industry. For example, President-elect Bill
- Clinton, in his A Technology Policy for America: Six Broad Initiatives
- dated September, 1992 states:
-
- A 21st century infrastructure program should consist of the
- following five elements:
-
- Funding the establishment of key networks and
- demonstration projects;
- ...
- Providing training for users of networks and
- databases.
-
- The ideology of the project however, can be summarized in the words of
- a single man, whose company has come to dominate computers and
- communications around the world:
-
- "As the value of information rises progressively and the cost
- of information circulation falls, the economic equilibrium
- point will come down to a level where enormous quantities of
- information can flow. The so-called information society is
- nothing buy a society that has reached this point. The
- advances in C&C [Computers & Communications] technology ensure
- the coming of such a society, and we now stand in the
- transition period leading to the information society era." Dr.
- Koji Kobayashi, Chairman of NEC, and author of Computers &
- Communications.
-
- 2.1 Connecting As Many People as Possible
-
- In the past, most projects have limited their scope of coverage to be
- a specific group of people in the area. Perhaps limiting just to a
- certain group that uses a specific machine type (i.e IBM PC or
- Macintosh), while ignoring the larger base of people that aren't
- necessarily specific to a certain machine type.
-
- The goal of this project is to remove as many barriers as is possible
- that might normally be placed on the user, such as machine
- requirements, money, etc. There are three main groups of people that
- this project is trying to connect: local individuals, local school and
- everyone else that is interested in Austin, but perhaps doesn't live
- here.
-
- 2.1.1 Individuals
-
- In a society that is increasingly connected by computers and where
- technology drives society rather than the other way around, it is
- essential for every individual to understand and utilize computers
- and communications to the best of their abilities. Until recently, the
- individual was limited to a small subset of the communications
- environment at home, and in many cases was forced to pay fees for
- the time they used on the systems.
-
- Connect*Austin tries to solve this problem by offering various levels
- of service to every group that it is designed the help. While some
- might want more features and less help, others might be interested in
- more hand-holding with less of an emphasis on power and complexity.
-
- 2.1.2 Local Schools
-
- Until recently it has been prohibitively expensive to connect school
- below the college level to any kind of real-time computer network.
- Now, it is possible to connect highschools and other secondary
- schools to various networks for a minimum of cost and effort. While
- they might not have the more advanced networking that the colleges and
- universities might be used to, they would be a step ahead of what is
- currently the norm.
-
- One of the primary goals of the Connect*Austin project is to connect
- as many of the local area schools as possible. While real-time
- connectivity might not be possible from the start, it is felt that the
- goal of connecting schools together so they can share information
- and resources is a good one and should be pursued with assistance from
- the government wherever possible.
-
- In this age of information and high-tech computers and communications,
- it's essential that children growing up learning to use the new
- technology in their everyday lives.
-
- 2.1.3 Others Outside of Austin
-
- There are many people around the country that have at some time lived
- in the Austin metropolitan area, or have family and friends in the
- area that would be interested in communicating with them, and keeping
- up-to-date with the area itself. While it might not be possible to
- connect everyone that has at one point lived in the area, the
- resources should be provided (perhaps through Internet) to anyone who
- is interested in the city.
-
- 2.2 Lack of Fee For General Use
-
- It is felt that when any financial barrier is removed from the project
- that the number of people that are capable of participating will be
- maximized. While it may not be possible for everything that the
- project intends to provide to be done without charging, the basic and
- most important services should be free an available to anyone that
- wants them. When a fee is imposed for the most basic of services,
- rather than imposing a small charge for the larger services, many
- people will be unable or unwilling to participate, and while in a
- ideal world situation, this wouldn't exist, the world has
- never been ideal from any perspective.
-
- In later sections, where an overview of features and services is
- provided, there will be a notation as to those that might have to have
- a fee attached to them.
-
- 2.3 Both/And Rather Than Either/Or
-
- Nicholas Necroponte (director of the MIT Media Lab) once said that
- "the only option in the future will be for computers to provide a
- solution of both/and rather than their current either/or." This is
- the approach that Connect*Austin believes in and attempts to provide
- in this proposal. What this means is that wherever possible, multiple
- solutions to the problem should be provided rather than making a guess
- as to what the majority would prefer. In the view of this project that
- means providing for several classes of users:
-
- Computerphobe---this is someone that is generally afraid of
- computers and only uses them with deep dread and worry.
-
- This is the group that requires the most hand-holding and
- coaxing, and wants the most simple interface to a computer as
- possible. In fact they would prefer if the computer itself
- would just disappear.
-
- Novice/New User---this is someone who has just recently begun
- using computers (or just recently begun using personal
- computers more specifically). While they aren't afraid of
- computer per-say, they need all the assistance that they can
- get in becoming more proficient.
-
- This group needs a simple interface to start with, but many
- will eventually want something more powerful and versatile as
- they become more confident.
-
- Average User---this is the average computer user who is
- familiar with personal computers (PCs), but isn't very
- familiar with many of the more advanced computer systems and
- therefore would require assistance in utilizing some of the
- more advanced features.
-
- This group would contain people that wanted both a simple
- menu-driven interface, and those that want something more
- advanced and versatile.
-
- Advanced User---this group contains what most people the most
- advanced of computer users. For many the only consideration in
- design is that of power and versatility and not ease of use.
- Also, this group would be interested in features and services
- that perhaps would not appeal to many in the other groups.
-
- Until recently, the only group that had it's needs addressed was
- the last, while the others were left to flounder and find their own
- solutions within the quagmire that represents much of technology.
- Rather than limit the solution to fit those people who fit a single
- group, it was decided that a solution (or solutions) should be found
- that would satisfy the needs of as many people as possible, without
- being inappropriate for any of them.
-
- 2.4 Disseminate Information
-
- One of the primary goals of this project is to provide a common
- "clearing house" of information for the city of Austin, the
- surrounding communities that are so inter-twined with the city, as
- well as government information from both the State of Texas and the
- federal government. Wherever possible, information of interest to any
- part of the population should be available without restrictions.
-
- While there might be some segment of the population that believes that
- information should be restricted, the belief is in the old saying:
-
- "Information is power."
-
- In the past, many people have seen information as a "privilege" rather
- than a right, something that can be held as power over another person
- or group. This project seeks to make information more of an innate
- right of every individual without respect to any societal groupings.
- Only when everyone has equal access to information of public inter-
- est will the concept on an "information society" become a
- reality.
-
- 2.5 Provide a Public Forum
-
- One goal of any enterprise that seeks to connect people is to provide
- a forum of some sort to the populous. In this project we seek to
- provide an open forum to the public without any extraneous
- limitations on discussion or debate.
-
- While such things as libel and slander should not be allowed, the
- simple fact that a topic is not generally acceptable shouldn t be
- cause enough to deem it unacceptable for discussion under the
- Connect*Austin umbrella. It is our view that the limitations should be
- similar to those of a newspaper, where the only thing that is required
- is that any statements not be libelous or slanderous.
-
- For many years people have looked to computers to provide a forum for
- topics that either are not appropriate for discussion on more
- conventional media, or are of such a timely nature as to require
- almost instantaneous speed of dissemination. Connect*Austin seeks to
- provide this, without undue restriction placed on the participants.
- Rather than place restrictions on the discussion, we feel it is better
- to allow discussions to progress and only deal with the exceptions,
- rather than making a rule to limit the common discussion.
-
- If there become problems with the nature of discussions on the system,
- and if there might be something illegal about those discussions, then
- Connect*Austin should take action, but not until then. Any actions
- taken before that point could squash the freespeech and discussion
- that this country was founded to protect.
-
- 3.0 Computers & Communications in Austin
-
- Over the past decade in Austin, many Bulletin Board Systems (BBS) have
- sprung up on the fertile ground provided by the abundance of local
- high-technology companies in addition to the academic environment
- provided by the local higher education establishment, most
- especially The University of Texas at Austin.
-
- 3.1 The Technology Infrastructure
-
- Austin is unique in its combination of computers and communications
- both in its diversity and completeness. Within the Austin
- metropolitan area---including roughly half a million people---the City
- contains large percentage of the dominant research and production
- infrastructure for technology in the United States. Perhaps no other
- one location in the United States contains such a wide range of
- computer and technology companies. For example:
-
- Microelectronics & Computer Consortium
- This is the first and perhaps is still the premier computer
- research organization outside the academic environment. MCC as
- it is commonly called is chartered to advance the
- state-of-the-art in both hardware and software technology.
-
- Sematech
- Sematech is the United States semiconductor industries answer
- to the competition from Japan. The non-profit corporation is
- charted to advance the technology in the actual production of
- semiconductor parts and claims as its members every major
- semiconductor company in the US.
-
- IC2
- While many people are unaware of the work at this small
- think tank, its members are some of the most
- prestigious computer people in the US and its charter nd goal
- is parallel to this project, that of making the city of
- Austin, a technopolis.
-
- In addition to these organizations that are designed to advance the
- state-of-the-art in computers and communications, there are several
- smaller organizations that have done their part to both connect Austin
- and bring technology to the populous.
-
- Electronic Frontier Foundation, Austin
- As the first local chapter of the national EFF organization,
- this group ha tried to bring both technological awareness and
- advancement to what William Gibson first termed cyberspace.
-
- Capital Area Central Texas Unix Society (CACTUS)
- As the only local user's group dedicated to supporting all
- forms of Unix, CACTUS has tried to the best of its abilities
- to bring computer communications to the largest number of
- people possible.
-
- 3.2 The BBS Effect
-
- In this time period and among this multitude of individual efforts, a
- single theme began to surface that seemed to be present no matter who
- the idea belonged to and no matter what form the implementation took.
- The theme was quite simple: to connect everyone in the city together.
-
- Now instead of everyone having to know each other, they all only need
- have a computer, a modem and the common knowledge of the remote system
- (the BBS). Because of the removed barriers, people who might never
- have had the opportunity to meet and get to know one another did, and
- many even built lasting friendships.
-
- Over the years some problems became apparent, most of them stemming
- from several factors. When the number of simultaneous sessions is
- limited, the pace at which a conversation, discussion or debate can
- progress is dramatically reduced, causing many people to seek other,
- more conventional medium for the expression of their ideas and their
- communications.
-
- In an attempt to try and reverse this trend, several people tried to
- start multi-user systems, all of which started out or
- eventually became pay. While in many cases, many of the problems
- associated with the previous generation of systems were solved, a new
- set of problems were introduced. The primary problem introduced was
- that of expense, where the user was now required to pay to use the
- system, and therefor had to make some judgement as to its worth. In
- many cases this was done before the user even had an idea of what the
- system could provide, much less working experience to decide its true
- value to him/her.
-
- While in many cases, this financial barrier to membership in
- the new systems was reasonable (something on the order of a few
- dollars per month), it presented a choice that most people were
- unwilling to make. Not only were they unsure of the worth of the sys-
- tem, but in many cases they could obtain 95% of the services and value
- in the system from some other source for free, in which case, the
- option of paying was deemed unreasonable. In addition, in some
- cases, the people using the system couldn't justify (or possibly
- afford) the fee being charged, and hence it was impossible for them to
- continue. As a result, many members of the community were and still
- are excluded by the more conventional approach to larger systems
- (i.e. fees and charges).
-
- In addition to the financial barrier provided, there is another
- barrier that is both obvious, but generally overlooked. There is a
- large percentage of the population that doesn't own their own
- computer, but yet perhaps uses one at work, or simply has an interest
- in computers that is unsatiated because of either their financial
- situation or other circumstances. Any system that wishes to connect
- the largest number of people must place the fewest number of
- requirements on the end user as a "base entrance requirement," and
- should also provide for access to people who do not have their own
- systems.
-
- 4.0 The Proposal
-
- This section contains the text of the proposal itself, including
- various ideas of what constitutes "fair use" for the system.
- While the text of this document is not immutable, it is felt that the
- idealogy embodied should not be modified by later revision.
-
- While an attempt was made to be as thorough as is possible in
- presenting the proposal, it is the unfortunate fact that there will
- undoubtedly be points left undiscussed. For this reason, please take
- this as a guide to the ideas and principles rather than a "menu of
- items."
-
- 4.1 Stages
-
- The proposal itself would be nearly impossible to implement in a
- single stage---from nothing to everything---therefore the proposal
- is designed to be implemented in 3 stages over a period of time.
-
- The stages are as follows:
-
- Basic services
-
- Austin metropolitan IP network (AMNET)
-
- Internet connection
-
- The rest of this section will be dedicated to describing the stages in
- more detail.
-
- 4.1.1 Stage 1---Basic Services
-
- The first stage of the project is designed to implement the
- infrastructure necessary to continue the project on through
- completion. The emphasis is on design and planning for the future
- rather than a "quick and dirty" implementation that provides
- many services, but is unable to expand as necessitated by future
- developments.
-
- At this stage the system is not actually on Internet, but instead has
- a link to a machine on Internet where it gets mail and news. The
- services provided to Austin consist of those listed below.
-
- Electronic Mail between users on the system and anyone else
- around the world that can be reached via a combination of
- Internet and/or UUCP.
-
- UseNet
-
- UUCP links to anyone who wants them, including name service
- for a full domain name (austin.org perhaps).
-
- Connections to people around Austin will be provided by various
- methods, including:
-
- Dial-up BBS-style accounts
-
- Dial-up shell access
-
- UUCP links
-
- The links would be provided by a bank of modems at a central location
- attached to either one large computer or several smaller networked
- machines. It was decided that as many modems as possible should be
- V.32 or higher (V.32bis preferable) as that is becoming the standard
- for modems in this day and age. At the very minimum, there should be
- high-speed modems for the UUCP links.
-
- For those with shell accounts (i.e. direct access to the underlying
- Unix operating system), the following capabilities should be
- provided:
-
- Editing
-
- Document Formatting
-
- Program Development
-
- UseNet
-
- E-mail
-
- While this situation might not provide everyone with everything that
- they might want, it is a strong starting point for eventually moving
- into more advanced areas. In addition, the system, even at this point,
- provides more connections to the outside world (via Internet links)
- than are normally available.
-
- 4.1.2 Stage 2---Austin Metropolitan IP Network (AMNET)
-
- To further connect the Austin area and provide even more services to
- the area, it was decided that the Austin metropolitan area should be
- linked using the IP (Internet Protocol) set of protocols. The
- protocols were chosen for several reasons:
-
- Technical Merit---They are widely considered the most well
- though out suite of protocols without the baggage of more
- "official" systems, such as OSI.
-
- Low Cost---Both the standards themselves and many programs
- which implement them are available for no cost. The KA9Q
- package (written by Phil Karn) provides IP connectivity for
- many different hardware platforms, and is available for free.
-
- Popularity---The IP suite of protocols is one of the most
- common in the world, and while there might be more hosts
- running proprietary protocols (such as AppleTalk or Novell's
- IPX), there is no other open protocol that is more widely used
- anywhere in the world.
-
- The initial concept is to produce create AMNET in the manner pictured
- in Figure 1 on page 18.
-
- FIGURE 1. Initial AMNET Topology
-
- [Figure removed in ASCII version]
-
- The network is designed to connect as many people as possible within
- the city of Austin using the IP protocol suite, and provide a common
- link to the outside world that will "gateway" services such as
- mail and news to Internet. The links themselves would be composed of
- either SLIP (Serial Line IP) or PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol)
- connections to a terminal server (from cisco, etc.) or Dial-up network
- box (Telebit NetBlazer) using V.32 (9600bps without compression) as a
- minimum acceptable connection speed.
-
- The network would be topologically the same as one actually connected
- to Internet, and the administration aspects would be as close as
- possible to Internet so as to facilitate the eventual transition to a
- real connection to Internet. Services provided by the AMNET NOC
- (Network Operations Center):
-
- Name Service---This includes both primary and secondary name
- entries. In addition it would also provide for MX (Mail
- Forwarding) records so that mail sent to a system gets
- forwarded to the correct machine.
-
- Remote Mail Retrieval---Several protocols area available today
- including POP (Post Office Protocol, RFC1225), IMAP
- (Interactive Mail Access Protocol, RFC1203) and PCMAIL
- (RFC1056). This will allow people to not be required to store
- all their e-mail on their machines and just "pick-up" what
- they need from the AMNET machines.
-
- UseNet---Using NNTP (Network News Transfer Protocol, RFC977)
- to allow people to either interactively read news using the
- AMNET machines as their "news server" or also allow people
- gain a feed containing the exact groups they want to read
- themselves.
-
- This is but a small number of the services that AMNET would provide to
- people who were participants in the metropolitan network.
-
- It is felt that by networking the Austin metropolitan area first,
- before adding in the entire world (through Internet) that people will
- be more responsible and ready for the resources that will be available
- once the final stage is completed.
-
- 4.1.3 Stage 3---Internet Connectivity
-
- The final stage of building the network is to actually connect AMNET
- to the rest of the world. This will preferably be done by linking
- AMNET as a network to either one of the mid-level networks (Sesquinet,
- THEnet) or to one of the backbone networks (NSFnet, PSInet, Alternet).
- By the time AMNET is prepared to go onto Internet itself, it is quite
- likely that the foundations of the NREN (National Research and
- Education Network) will have been laid, and this would create an
- excellent infrastructure to use.
-
- The goals of the NREN are stated in the House-Senate compromise
- version of S. 272 The High-Performance Computing Act, passed the House
- on November 20, 1991, the Senate on November 22, 1991, and signed by
- the President on December 9, 1991. Below are some excerpts from
- "Section 3. Purpose":
-
- The purpose of this Act is to help ensure the continued
- leadership of the United States in high-performance computing
- and its applications by---
-
- (1) expanding Federal support for research, development,
- and application of high-performance computing in order to---
-
- (A) establish a high-capacity and high-speed National Research
- and Education Network;
-
- (B) expand the number of researchers, educators, and students
- with training in high-performance computing and access to
- high-performance computing resources;
-
- (C) promote the further development of an information
- infrastructure of data bases, services, access mechanisms, and
- research facilities available for use through the Network;
-
- (D) stimulate research on software technology;
-
- (E) promote the more rapid development and wider distribution
- of computer software tools and applications software;
-
- (H) invest in basic research and education, and promote the
- inclusion of high-performance computing into educational
- institutions at all levels; and
-
- (I) promote greater collaboration among government, Federal
- laboratories, industry, high-performance computing centers,
- and universities;
-
- It is felt that Connect*Austin falls under many of the concepts that
- this act and therefore might be able to benefit from both the NREN and
- also from governmental support directly.
-
- 4.2 Non-profit Status
-
- It is felt that the only way to guarantee that the project will stay
- relatively "free" of financial encumbrances is to charter the project
- as a non-profit corporation. This will provide several advantages:
-
- Provide for protection from tampering by people who might wish
- to profit from the project.
-
- Provide protection for the project itself from anyone who
- might be disgruntled by an occurrence that they may not agree
- with. This is the legal protection of the corporation being
- treated as an individual.
-
- Provide continuity to the project that will exceed the efforts
- of the people involved in its creation
-
- While there will be more paperwork involved by giving the project
- non-profit standing, it is felt that the hassle is far outweighed by
- the gains that come from it.
-
- 4.3 Funding of the Project
-
- The first and most important aspect of the project is to decide how it
- will be funded since it will consume a substantial amount of time and
- money, both of which must be dealt with if the project is to be
- successful. There are several approaches that can be taken to paying
- for the project:
-
- Donations
-
- Usage fees
-
- It is felt however, that a combination of the two is the best
- approach, since while the former may be idealistically the
- preferential solution, it is doubtful that it will be achievable in
- the immediate future.
-
- The primary source of funding still should be donations from both the
- government (such as the National Science Foundation), corporations and
- individual citizens. For the residual expenses, instead of charging
- everyone a general use fee, it is desirable that people should pay a
- small some of money toward the most expensive services (those which
- cost the project directly to provide) that they use. Those services
- that have a fee attached to them will be denoted in the sections
- following by a dollar sign (`$').
-
- 4.4 Location and Connection
-
- The next problems that require solutions are those of physical
- connectivity and proximity.
-
- 4.4.1 Location
-
- Once the funding has been obtained it will be necessary to find a
- suitable location to house both the equipment and the people that are
- associated with the project. There are several requirements:
-
- Physical security
-
- Proper electrical service
-
- Stability of presence
-
- The last one is perhaps unclear at first read. What it means is that
- the location should be something that is as permanent as is possible.
- This means that homes and small businesses would have to be
- excluded. While they might provide the other two requirements, it is
- undesirable to hinge a project of this importance on something that is
- beyond the control of the project. A small business or individual
- would be subject to more strenuous financial considerations than a
- larger business.
-
- 4.4.2 Connectivity
-
- There is also the consideration of connectivity, which means what
- services will it be connected to. In the case of this project that
- primarily means eventually the Internet. Initially however, the
- connection would be limited to UUCP which is more batch related than
- real-time. There are several service providers in the Austin area that
- could provide the connection:
-
- Sesquinet (Internet)
-
- PSInet (Internet)
-
- In the end, the decision of which network to connect to could also be
- decided by where the project is located. It would be desirable for the
- project to be located on a site that already has Internet connections,
- to prevent having to pay for leased lines. The major connections in
- Austin are: UT, IBM, MCC, Dell Computer and the Texas Education
- Agency.
-
- For UUCP links, the following sources area available, though this is
- by far not a complete list:
-
- The University of Texas at Austin (UUCP)
-
- Microelectronics and Computers Consortium
-
-
- 4.5 Equipment Requirements
-
- The requirements on the equipment that will be used for this project
- are very demanding and there is only a limited amount of equipment
- around that is capable of providing the combination of performance and
- reliability that are a necessity when pursuing a project like this.
- The most basic requirement is that the machine run an operating system
- that is related to Unix, preferably one that is flavored as that of
- the Berkeley Standard Distribution 4.3 (BSD4.3).
-
- While it would be possibly to use another operating system, it would
- however complicate the issue of software and usability immensely, so
- it is felt that Unix should be required. There are several companies
- that have either their headquarters here in Austin or have major
- installations here that provide such equipment. They are:
-
- IBM AWD (Advanced Workstations Division)
- IBM produces the RS/6000 line of machines which represent some
- of the fastest and most reliable machines on the market. They
- have a dedication to community efforts as well that should
- help in acquiring their support.
-
- Dell Computer Corporation
- Dell is headquartered here in Austin and produces a line of PC
- based on the Intel 80x86 architecture, most specifically the
- 80386 and 80486. While not the most appropriate machines on
- the market, Dell has also shown a dedication both to Austin
- and to Internet.
-
- CompuAdd Corporation
- CompuAdd is one of the largest PC clone manufacturers and also
- manufactures Sun SparcStation clones that compete favorably in
- both price and performance with the original machines.
-
- Sun Microsystems
- Sun is the manufacturer of the most popular line of
- workstations in the world, with almost 50% of the market
- share. They have a relatively large site here in Austin, and
- might be interested in showcasing their newest line of
- computers, the SparcStation 10.
-
- Tandem Computers
- Tandem's main development site is here in Austin and they are
- the #1 maker of what is termed "fault-tolerant" computer
- systems (systems which can survive major failures of
- components). They might be interested also in showcasing their
- newest NONSTOP system.
-
- Motorola
- Motorola is best known as a semiconductor company, and they
- have their most advanced plant in the world here in Austin
- (MOS-11 in Oak Hill), but they also produce machines based on
- their 88K RISC architecture that are designed as servers.
-
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI)
- SGI is the maker of the high-end graphics machines responsible
- for the creation of many special effects scenes in movies.
- They also have a line of servers (IRIS 4D) that could be used
- for the central computer in this project.
-
- While this list no doubt leaves out a large number of companies in the
- Austin area that could be approached for equipment, it is simply a
- starting point for determining what equipment is necessary.
-
- It is felt that while many lower performance computers could be used
- to provide the necessary power for this project, the problems stemming
- from this in both administration and physical considerations suggest
- that a single central computer would be much more appropriate, with
- some of the services off-loaded onto smaller machines where possible.
-
- 4.6 Access Methods
-
- One of the most important considerations, and also one that is usually
- left until last is the consideration of how the system should be
- accessed. It is felt, in accordance with Necroponte's attitude that
- there should be several methods allowed, so as not to exclude
- needlessly members of society that might wish to contribute.
-
- There are 3 primary methods by which access should be granted to
- people who wish to participate:
-
- Dial-up
- This would be provided by a bank of modems that people could
- call from home/work and use to access the system itself.
-
- Internet
- Since the machines are on Internet already, it should be
- possible for anyone who already has Internet access to connect
- to the machines using the standard "remote login" facilities
- provided by the network. This broadens the user base to
- include not only people in Austin and Central Texas, but also
- the rest of the world.
-
- Walk-in
- This is a unique approach which may or may not be possible
- from the beginning in that it is the idea to provide a public
- terminal facility by which people who do not have computers
- (or modems) or who cannot afford them at the current time can
- participate in the project. This facility should be situated
- along a bus-route and also as close to down-town as is
- possible.
-
- In addition, for people who are using the dial-up system there are
- several other methods that can be used that provide an interface to
- the system that is different than what would be presented to a
- "normal user," who is simply using the system to gain
- information and not necessarily taking advantage of more advanced
- techniques.
-
- Menu interface
- This is the standard BBS-style interface that presents the use
- a menu of choices to pick from and guides them through the
- system providing a comfortable interface to the more
- powerful features. This approach however, generally limits the
- overall power that can be presented to the user.
-
- Shell access
- This would provide the more advanced user with a full Unix
- shell that he/she could use as they wish. While the interface
- might not be the most "user-friendly" in many people's
- eyes, this would provide capabilities that would be missing in
- the normal menu interface.
-
- UUCP links
- UUCP is Unix-to-Unix Copy, and represents the way in which
- many small computers (including non-Unix machines)
- communicate to exchange files, mail and other information.
- While not as full-featured as some of the other techniques, it
- presents a low-cost (hardware wise) entry into networking
- machines together.
-
- SLIP/PPP ($)
- These are protocols that allow someone to place a small
- personal computer on Internet using a subset of the full
- protocol suite. These should be provided (and administered)
- for those people who want the maximum amount of power and the
- least amount of "hand holding."
-
- Because of the amount of effort and expenditure of resources
- that are involved in supporting additional machines on
- Internet, a small fee would have to be charged to provide this
- resource. The fee however, should not be so great as to
- preclude most people who would be seriously interested in this
- service.
-
- 4.7 Resources
-
- When it comes right down to the heart of the issue, what people want
- are resources to utilize as they see fit. The issue of how those are
- presented is in many cases secondary. If you don't have what people
- need, then they aren't going to participate. This section presents a
- list of some of the more important resources that Connect*Austin
- should provide.
-
- 4.7.1 Electronic Mail
-
- In the 1990s, electronic mail (e-mail) has become the mainstay of
- corporate and academic America. It is estimated that Internet alone
- carries millions of e-mail messages every year. E-mail allows two
- people to communicate privately about any topic they choose. E-mail is
- not absolutely secure, which is why something called encryption is
- often used to protect the information even further.
-
- It is felt that Connect*Austin should work to ensure privacy for it's
- participants by automatically encrypting e-mail between any two
- users without even prompting the user. While mail such as this might
- not leave the system, it will be secure from all but the most well
- equipped curious eyes.
-
- 4.7.2 UseNet
-
- UseNet (User's Network) is a network of tens of thousands of machines
- around the world that exchange what is called "news" in many
- diverse and interesting groups. At this point in time there are
- thousands newsgroups on topics as diverse as politics and huge-number
- theory. The network centers on computer topics, but also delves into
- such areas as sociology, economics, politics, music and sports. Table1
- on page12 contains information that should give an idea as to the
- scope and size of UseNet's coverage.
-
- TABLE 1. UseNet Statistics
-
- Statistic
-
- Current
- Standing
-
- Total number of groups including all regional hierarchies
-
- > 4,222
-
- Number of articles passing through uunet in a 2 week period of time
-
- 274,951@491.9Mb
-
- Estimated number of active sites
-
- 23,606
-
- Estimated number of readers
-
- 500,000
-
- Estimated number of active contributors
-
- 67,133
-
- Connect*Austin should provide every group that is widely available
- without limit or censorship to its patrons. While there might be a
- small handful of groups that would be restricted to those over 18
- years of age, there should otherwise be no limit onto what information
- and discussions people may engage in. It is not for this project to
- decide what is appropriate and what isn't.
-
- 4.7.3 ClariNet ($)
-
- While ClariNet is built on top of the same system as UseNet is, it is
- a for-profit system that provides both the AP (Associated Press) and
- UPI (United Press International) newswires in almost real time
- grouped into hundreds of categories. In addition to world/ nation
- news, the service provides news of a more local and regional nature.
-
- ClariNet is however a commercial service, and charges its users fees
- for the access to the information. It is felt that Connect*Austin
- should relay the cost if necessary on to the end user that wishes to
- use the system.
-
- There is a question as to how we would be permitted to charge based on
- the structure that ClariNet requires for payment. This however, at
- worst would amount to a small sum of money. The actual details
- however, could be worked out later. The cost of the service breaks
- down as shown in Table2.
-
- TABLE 2. ClariNet Cost Based on Usage
-
- Number of Users
-
- Educational Price
-
- Less than 5,000
-
- $175/month
-
- 5,000 -20,000
-
- $350/month
-
- 20,000 and over
-
- $580/month
-
- 4.7.4 Internet
-
- Internet is the world's largest meta-network of computer systems.
- Internet connects many countries around the world, and links
- educational organizations with both government offices and
- commercial groups. For an idea of how big Internet really is, look at
- Table3.
-
- TABLE 3. Internet Statistics as of October 1992
-
- Number of machines
-
- 1,136,000
-
- Number of organizations
-
- 18,100
-
- Number of countries represented
-
- > 45
-
- Percent increase in network size over 3 month period
-
- 14.5%
-
- Internet also provides the ability to access many resources that would
- otherwise be difficult or impossible to use. Below is a short list
- of some of the more important and useful services that can be accessed
- through the use of Internet.
-
- Gopher
- This is a system that is designed to make the retrieval of
- files and information over Internet easier to use for the
- common user. It is a menu-driven system that guides the user
- through topics until they find the information they are
- looking for.
-
- Wide Area Information Service (WAIS)
- This project is the creation of Thinking Machines in
- Cambridge, M.A., and is designed to provide the user with a
- distributed database of information around the world that can
- be searched for information that they are interested in.
- Topics range from the Bible to recipes and technical
- information on computers.
-
- Archie
- This is a database of files that are available on public
- archive sites around Internet. Through the use of the Archie
- service, a user can find the exact program that they are
- looking for. It is estimated that there is over 250Gb
- (gigabytes) of information and programs stored on public
- archive sites around the world.
-
- World Wide Web
- This is a world-wide hypertext system designed and being
- implemented by some mebers of CERN in Switzerland. It is much
- more advanced than any other system, but is also more complex
- and "bulky."
-
- Weather Service
- Run by the meteorology department at the University of
- Michigan, Ann Arbor, this service provides hourly access to
- weather information around the world. It also provides access
- to weather maps, hurricane information, earthquake infor-
- mation as well as volcano information.
-
- Remote Access
- Through the use of this service provided by Internet, a user
- could look in library catalogs around the world, with the
- University of Texas and Texas A&M being but two small parts of
- it.
-
- 4.7.5 Political Information
-
- Politics in this country have becoming increasingly dependent on the
- availability of information to make an informed decision on candidates
- for both local and national offices. Connect*Austin could provide an
- immeasurable service by providing both information on candidates
- running for office as well as information on those already in office
- and those that have been involved in the past.
-
- The primary topics that should be covered are:
-
- Congressional Memories Project
- This project attempts to document the voting practice of all
- the Congressional members. Without information on exactly how
- your representative is voting, it is hard to gauge how well
- he/she is representing you.
-
- Campaign Information
- In this year of presidential election, it has become
- increasingly apparent that simply watching television or
- reading the newspaper will not be enough to make an informed
- decision.
-
- Connect*Austin should attempt to provide a forum in which candidates
- for any office can express their opinions (without advertising). It
- should not however become yet another form of "campaigning," and
- should instead be an extension of the debate format if possible.
-
- Supreme Court Opinions: Project Hermes
- In the past it has been difficult for normal US citizens to
- gain access to the decisions of the Supreme Court. This
- project is trying to provide easy and up to the minute access
- to Supreme Court documents so that people can decide for them-
- selves what the court is saying without having to depend on
- someone else to condense it for them.
-
- General Accounting Office Information
- In this age of climbing national debt, many people are curious
- as to where the money is going, and whether it is being spent
- wisely. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is responsible for
- maintaining budget information for the government and this
- information should be available directly to the citizen in an
- easy format.
-
- Historical Documents
- Throughout history, many documents have shaped the course of
- this nation and the world itself. In addition to the Magna
- Carta and the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, there are
- many other works written by famous and not so famous people
- that could be of use to someone who is interest in where the
- world has come from and where it is going to.
-
- 4.7.6 City Information
-
- The City of Austin and its surrounding neighbors are full of
- interesting and exciting activities as well as a large number of
- untapped resources. Connect*Austin should strive to make it easy for
- the individual to find out what is going on and what is available
- around the city.
-
- This section lists some of the resources and areas that Connect*Austin
- could provide information on.
-
- Capital Metro
- By providing a quick way to look up bus routes and information
- about service, Connect*Austin could help encourage more people
- to use the Metro bus system in Austin and reduce the pollution
- of the atmosphere.
-
- Robert Mueller Airport
- A great service to the community would be provided by
- publishing information on flights that are going in to and out
- of the airport. Also, information should be provided as to
- whether the flights are on time or late, in addition to any
- general information on the airport itself (closings,
- emergencies, etc.).
-
- Convention Center
- With the construction of the new Austin Convention Center,
- Austin will be hosting more and more regional and national
- conventions which others in the city might be interested in
- participating in. Connect*Austin could help by listing con-
- vention information and contact information
-
- Clubs
- Austin is a city that revolves around music and clubs. With
- literally hundreds of clubs there is no way that any one
- person can keep up with the bands playing and the shows going
- on.
-
- Movie Theatres
- Austin is fortunate to have one of the finest movie theatre
- bases in the nation (with more THX theatres than any other
- city in the US), however it can sometimes be difficult to
- find out what movies are playing where. Connect*Austin could
- help by providing a forum to discuss movies and review them by
- individuals rather than newspapers.
-
- Public Access TV
- The city has gained national attention and respect for its
- diverse public access TV system. The primary problem is that
- is very difficult, if nearly impossible for a person to find
- out exactly what is going to be on which channel on a specific
- night. In addition, Connect*Austin could provide a forum for
- discussion of shows that already exist as well as shows that
- are in the production stages and simply those that are being
- thought about.
-
- Austin Symphony & Austin Lyric Opera
- With two of the finest groups in the nation, it would be
- helpful for people to find out information about upcoming
- performances as well as perhaps communicating with the
- people that run both organizations so that a 2-way
- communication could be set up to help the organizations tailor
- their programs for the community.
-
- In addition to these ideas there are several others that go beyond
- what is conventionally considered for projects of this nature. They
- are designed to broaden the base of information available to the
- participants in the project to include items besides the standard text
- that normal is so prevalent.
-
- Computer Images of Artist's Work
- With computer graphics reaching a all time high in quality,
- quantity and affordability, it seems that it is time to take
- art into the computer age. It should be possible or an
- artist to submit a photograph of his/her work and have it made
- available in a computer-compatible format on the system so
- that others may look at it. This service should be made
- available for little or no cost to the artist him/herself.
-
- Samples of Local Music Artists
- It should also be possible for local musicians to send in
- tapes to be "sampled" and made available on the system for
- others to listen to and encourage participa tion in the music
- scene. A relatively low-resolution format should be used so as
- not to encourage people to only depend on the format.
-
- While this list is far from complete, it gives the reader an idea of
- the diverse nature of a system such as this, and the unique position
- that it is in to provide the participant a diverse collection of tools
- and resources.
-
- 5.0 Conclusion
-
- This document provides but a small glimpse at the possibilities of a
- system such as that suggested by the Connect*Austin project. There
- will no doubt be ideas thought up along the way that nobody at this
- point could have predicted. That however is the magic of an idea such
- as this. You give the people the ability to help control the system
- and you'll provide them with even more incentive to participate and
- give more to the project.
-
- As time moves on, more ideas and more resources will come to pass and
- the system should be designed so as to expand with the ideas without
- creating a burden on its participants and contributors.
-
- 6.0 The Authors
-
- This document wasn't written by a computer, nor did it write itself.
- It was instead the work of two individuals in the Austin area, who
- are listed below, along with how to contact them. The document itself
- was created using Emacs and the Framemaker page layout package on the
- NeXT computer.
-
- Chris Petrilli
- The University of Texas---Petroleum Engineering Department
- petrilli@nextover.pe.utexas.edu
- petrilli@gnu.ai.mit.edu
-
- Bob Izenberg
- Motorola Corporation---RISC Products Sector
- bobi@vswr.sps.mot.com
- bei@dogface.austin.tx.us
-
- --
- | Chris Petrilli
- | petrilli@nextover.pe.utexas.edu, petrilli@gnu.ai.mit.edu
- | All opinions are my own, if they even belong to anyone.
-
-
-