home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: aus.politics
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!titan!root
- From: c.oneill@trl.oz.au (Chris O'Neill)
- Subject: Re: Australia's Debt : IBIS view
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.071118.10905@trl.oz.au>
- Sender: root@trl.oz.au (System PRIVILEGED Account)
- Organization: Telecom Australia Research Laboratories
- References: <1992Nov9.071133.3345@trl.oz.au> <1992Nov9.110227.7510@trl.oz.au> <1992Nov10.021721.25895@trl.oz.au>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 07:11:18 GMT
- Lines: 47
-
- In article <1992Nov9.110227.7510@trl.oz.au> andrew@medici.trl.OZ.AU (Andrew
- Jennings) writes:
- >
- >I've been thinking about that post about our trade performance, and
- >how its improving. I think this article encapsulates the reasons
- >why its clearly not enough just to do this.
- >
- >
- >From the "Daily Commercial News" Monday November 2, written by Pauline
- >Zahra.
- >
- >The federal government's insistence that the balance of payments
- >problem could be solved by increasing exports was "propaganda" and
- >Australia was heading for disaster.
-
- Obviously, increasing exports is only going to solve the balance of payments
- problem if imports don't increase as much as the exports. I would hope that
- this is what the federal government is trying to imply.
-
- >This is the view of Phil Ruthven, executive director of IBIS Business
- >Information Services who predicted that the payments deficit was fast
- >approaching the previous record of $23 billion, set in 1989-90.
- >
- >Mr Ruthven told DCN the government's ploy of encouraging exports and
- >import replacements was paramount to "persistent lies" because the
- >major item causing the deficit was the climbing interest rate on the
- >foreign debt.
- >
- >Mr Ruthven said the merchandise balance of trade had improved in the
- >past few years and had been in surplus several times this year but the
- >imbalance on the services ledger had continued to grow.
- >
- >Mr Ruthven said the only way to arrest the foreign debt problem was to
- >lift the savings ratio which at the moment was a "disgraceful" five
- >percent. This compares with 11 percent in Japan, 23 percent in
- >Singapore and 31 percent in Taiwan.
-
- The rate of saving and the balance of trade are closely related, i.e. the more
- saving, the less spent on imports and hence the better the balance of trade.
- Mr. Ruthven appears to be implying that there is no necessary relationship.
- After all, "saving" in the context of foreign trade means that we export more
- than we import (i.e. our foreign income is greater than our foreign
- expenditure). One way of considering this is that perhaps we cannot get a
- substantial trade and services surplus unless there is sufficient saving.
-
- Chris O'Neill
- Telecom Research
-